The electromagnetic current vanishes identically in the Majorana case

Urvabara
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
The electromagnetic current vanishes identically in the Majorana case: http://users.jyu.fi/~hetahein/tiede/virta.pdf" .

In the case someone cannot open the pdf, here is the formula:
\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi = \overline{\psi^{C}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{C} = <br /> -\psi^{\text{T}}C^{\dagger}\gamma^{\mu}C\overline{\psi}^{\text{T}} \overset{?}{=} <br /> \overline{\psi}C\gamma^{\mu\text{T}}C^{\dagger}\psi = -\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi = 0.

Does anyone know how is that equality under the ?-sign proved? I just don't know how...

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Urvabara said:
The electromagnetic current vanishes identically in the Majorana case: http://users.jyu.fi/~hetahein/tiede/virta.pdf" .

In the case someone cannot open the pdf, here is the formula:
\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi = \overline{\psi^{C}}\gamma^{\mu}\psi^{C} = <br /> -\psi^{\text{T}}C^{\dagger}\gamma^{\mu}C\overline{\psi}^{\text{T}} \overset{?}{=} <br /> \overline{\psi}C\gamma^{\mu\text{T}}C^{\dagger}\psi = -\overline{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\psi = 0.

Does anyone know how is that equality under the ?-sign proved? I just don't know how...

Thanks!
First off, the electromagnetic current vanishes identically in the Majorana case only if you assume that the components of \psi are anticommuting. If they commute, the transition in question can be performed as follows: the scalar equals its own transposition, C and C-cross change sign under transposition. However, the resulting sign will differ from that in your formula. You obtain the third sign change when you drag anticommuting components of psi through each other.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top