The Facts About Nuclear Reactors: Churnobyl was an Exception

modmans2ndcoming
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
1) Churnobyl was NOT even close to what a typical nuclear reactor is like.
2)Reactors never go Nuclear Bomb, it is impossible
3)all reactors in service today would never melt down to the point of getting to the ground water, or even the ground because the reaction stops almost imediatly and the materials around the reactor core cool it to a low enough temp, very quickly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by modmans2ndcoming
1) Churnobyl was NOT even close to what a typical nuclear reactor is like.
In addition, even the crackpots can't show evidence for meaningful long term health effects of Chernobyl. In short, bad as Chernobyl was, it only killed a few dozen people - ie, nothing compared to coal.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top