The Fierz-Pauli action takes the form of the Maxwell action

  • A
  • Thread starter EnigmaticField
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Form Maxwell
In summary: B)(\partial^A\chi_B)]. This is the same result as stated in the paper.Moving on to your second concern about how S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)] takes the form of the Maxwell action for the 4-vector potential \chi^A, we need to recall the definition of the field strength tensor F_{AB}=\partial_A\chi_B-\partial_B\chi_A. Plugging this into the Maxwell action, we get:\int d^4x F_{AB}F^{AB}=\int d
  • #1
I read in a paper arXiv:1002.3877 a Higgs mechanism for massive gravity can be constructed by introducing 4 scalar fields (they play the role of the Higgs fields) [itex]\phi^A[/itex] with [itex]A=0,1,2,3[/itex] and then considering the Fierz-Pauli action [itex]S_{\rm{FP}}=\frac{m^2}{2}\int d^4x\sqrt{-g}(\bar{h}^2-\bar{h}^A{}_B\bar{h}^B{}_A)[/itex], where [itex]\bar{h}^{AB} =H^{AB}-\eta^{AB}[/itex], with [itex]H^{AB}=g^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\phi^A\partial_\nu\phi^B[/itex] and [itex]\eta_{AB}[/itex] is the Minkowski metric, with respect to which the indices [itex]A,B[/itex] are raised and lowered, and [itex]\bar{h}=\bar{h}^{AB}\eta_{AB}=\bar{h}^A{}_A[/itex].

The paper says the way to see how, to the linear approximation in field perturbation, four degrees of freedom for the scalar fields could disappear giving only three extra degrees of freedom to the graviton is to figure out that the Fierz-Pauli action takes the form of the Maxwell action in the linear perturbation. When the fields are expanded around the vacuum Minkowski solution [itex]<g_{\mu\nu}>=\eta_{\mu\nu}, <\phi^A>=x^A[/itex], we have [itex]\phi^A=x^A+\chi^A, g^{\mu\nu}=\eta^{\mu\nu}+h^{\mu\nu}[/itex]. Setting [itex]h^{\mu\nu}=0[/itex], to the linear order in perturbation [itex]\chi^A[/itex] we have [itex]\bar{h}^A{}_B=\partial_B\chi^A+\partial^A\chi_B[/itex], which gives [itex]S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)][/itex], which the paper says takes the form of the Maxwell action for the 4-vecror potential [itex]\chi^A[/itex].

My problems are that I can't see how [itex]\bar{h}^A{}_B=\partial_B\chi^A+\partial^A\chi_B[/itex] gives [itex]S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)][/itex] and that how the latter takes the form of the Maxwell action for the 4-vecror potential [itex]\chi^A[/itex]. I think the two problems lies in a common point: that the above two results hold entails [itex](\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)=0[/itex], but I can't derive it and don't think that's the case generically. For the first problem, I think [tex]\frac{1}{2}[\bar{h}^2-\bar{h}^A{}_B\bar{h}^B{}_A] \\
=[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)]+[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)].[/tex] Thus I think what the paper claims holds iff what in the second square bracket in the second line above vanishes, that is, [itex](\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)=0[/itex]. For the second problem, I think the Maxwell action with the vector potential [itex]\chi^A[/itex] is [tex]\int d^4xF_{AB}F^{AB}=\int d^4x(\partial_A\chi_B-\partial_B\chi_A)(\partial ^A\chi^B-\partial ^B\chi^A) \\
=\int d^4x 2[(\partial_A\chi_B)(\partial ^A\chi^B)-(\partial_A\chi_B)(\partial ^B\chi^A)] \\
=\int d^4x 2[(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)],[/tex] which I think is equal to [itex]-2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)][/itex] iff [itex](\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)=0[/itex].

I think it's impossible that [itex](\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_B\chi^A)(\partial_A\chi^B)=0[/itex] holds generically. So how are the two results arrived at?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for bringing up your concerns about the paper arXiv:1002.3877 and the Higgs mechanism for massive gravity. I understand the importance of verifying and understanding results in scientific literature, and I will do my best to address your concerns.

Firstly, I would like to clarify that the paper is discussing the linearized Fierz-Pauli action, which is valid for small perturbations around the Minkowski vacuum solution. This means that the terms in the action will be expanded to linear order in the perturbation fields, and higher order terms will be neglected. This is a common approach in theoretical physics, as it allows us to simplify complicated equations and focus on the essential features of a theory.

Now, let's address your first concern about how \bar{h}^A{}_B=\partial_B\chi^A+\partial^A\chi_B leads to S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)]. To understand this, we need to expand the terms in the Fierz-Pauli action to linear order in the perturbation fields. This gives us:

\bar{h}^2=\partial_A\chi^A\partial_B\chi^B

\bar{h}^A{}_B=\partial_B\chi^A+\partial^A\chi_B

Plugging these into the Fierz-Pauli action, we get:

S_{\rm{FP}}=\frac{m^2}{2}\int d^4x\sqrt{-g}(\partial_A\chi^A\partial_B\chi^B-\partial_A\chi^A\partial_B\chi^B-\partial_A\chi^B\partial^A\chi_B)

S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-m^2\int d^4x(\partial_A\chi^B)(\partial^A\chi_B)

As you can see, the term (\partial_A\chi^A)^2 cancels out, leaving us with S_{\rm{FP}}=m^2\int d^4x[(\partial_A\chi^A)^2-(\partial_A
 

1. What is the Fierz-Pauli action?

The Fierz-Pauli action is a mathematical expression used in theoretical physics to describe the behavior of a spin 2 particle, such as the graviton. It is based on the work of physicists Markus Fierz and Wolfgang Pauli and is a modification of the more well-known Maxwell action.

2. How does the Fierz-Pauli action differ from the Maxwell action?

The main difference between the Fierz-Pauli action and the Maxwell action is that the Fierz-Pauli action includes a mass term for the spin 2 particle, which is absent in the Maxwell action. This mass term allows for the existence of massive spin 2 particles, such as the graviton, which are not possible in the Maxwell theory.

3. What is the significance of the Fierz-Pauli action?

The Fierz-Pauli action is significant because it provides a mathematical framework for the study of spin 2 particles, which are crucial in understanding the behavior of gravity. The Fierz-Pauli action is also a key component in many theories of quantum gravity, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity.

4. How is the Fierz-Pauli action related to the Standard Model of particle physics?

The Fierz-Pauli action is not directly related to the Standard Model of particle physics, as the Standard Model only describes the behavior of spin 1/2 particles. However, the Fierz-Pauli action is an important concept in theories that aim to unify gravity with the other fundamental forces described by the Standard Model.

5. Are there any experimental confirmations of the Fierz-Pauli action?

There have been several experimental confirmations of the predictions made by the Fierz-Pauli action. For example, the existence of the graviton, which is described by the Fierz-Pauli action, has been indirectly confirmed through the detection of gravitational waves. Additionally, the predictions of the Fierz-Pauli action have been tested and verified in various experiments involving high-energy physics and cosmology.

Suggested for: The Fierz-Pauli action takes the form of the Maxwell action

Replies
1
Views
927
Replies
6
Views
989
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
949
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
1K
Back
Top