Classical The first book of E&M is for self-study

AI Thread Summary
Classical Electromagnetism by Jerrold Franklin is considered more advanced than Griffith's textbook, making it potentially challenging for self-study. While it is a well-regarded book, it is recommended to use Griffith's for a foundational understanding. If one has access to supplementary materials and possesses strong motivation, studying Franklin's book could be feasible, but caution is advised. Essential supplementary topics may include vector calculus and partial differential equations, as these are crucial for comprehending the more complex concepts presented in Franklin's work.
Passers_by
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Can Classical Electromagnetism by Jerrold Franklin replace Griffith's for self-study? The book is now in its second edition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a good book, but it is more advanced than Griffiths. If you have access to supplementary material and are really motivated, it MIGHT be possible, but I would recommend against it.
 
caz said:
It is a good book, but it is more advanced than Griffiths. If you have access to supplementary material and are really motivated, it MIGHT be possible, but I would recommend against it.
First, thank you for your advice. And what is the supplementary material?
 
It is written at a more advanced level, so there will be things that you will probably need expanded explanations for. For example, you might need more information on vector calculus and/or pde’s.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Passers_by

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Thread 'Blennow to follow up Altland?'

TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum Finding the Perfect Self-Study Book for Intro Stats & Quantum Mechanics
Replies
17
Views
3K
I Need Calculus Book Recommendations please
Replies
26
Views
5K
Book recommendations: Abstract Algebra for self-study
Replies
14
Views
8K
Classical Confusion between Electrodynamics texts
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
Classical Looking for book about relativistic classical field theory
Replies
15
Views
4K
Calculus Are These Books Good for Self-Studying Calculus in College?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Linear Algebra What are good second course books in linear algebra for self-study?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Opinions/personal experiences on the following four CompSci books
Replies
11
Views
219
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
Are Schaum books good for self-study?
Replies
16
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top