The free electron model vs. nearly free electron model.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between the free electron model and the nearly free electron model in solid-state physics. It establishes that Bragg reflection does not occur in the free electron model, as electrons are treated as independent particles in a zero-potential box. Materials such as alkali metals (e.g., sodium and potassium) and noble metals (e.g., copper, silver, and gold) exhibit behaviors that closely align with the free electron model, particularly due to their monovalent conduction electrons and minimal deviation from free electron behavior, as evidenced by De Haas-Van Alphen measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid-state physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the free electron model and nearly free electron model
  • Knowledge of Bragg reflection and its implications
  • Experience with Fermi surfaces and De Haas-Van Alphen effect
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Bragg reflection in solid-state physics
  • Explore the characteristics of alkali metals and noble metals in the context of electron behavior
  • Learn about the De Haas-Van Alphen effect and its measurement techniques
  • Investigate the differences in energy band structures between the free electron model and nearly free electron model
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in solid-state physics, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the electronic properties of metals and their theoretical models.

Brammo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Ok so If I plot ε(k) against k for the nearly free electron model there will be an energy gap. Bragg refelction leads to these energy gaps and standing waves. So does Bragg reflection not ocurr in the free electron model? What materials have the property of the free electron model and what materials the nearly free electron model?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course Bragg reflection does not occur in a 100% free electron model: the electrons are independent and "live" in a box with 0 potential (there are no positive ions).

No materials satisfy that, because that is the first approximation. But there are materials where this approximation may be really good: alkali metals, for example (noble metals also: Cu, Ag, Au). This happens because a free electron Fermi sphere for the only conduction electron -they are monovalent- is far away from the limits of the first Brillouin zone. So it deviates very little from the free electron behavior. Na and K, for example, produce De Haas-Van Alphen measurements (you know? this shows the Fermi surface structure) which deviate only a part in thousands from those expected from the free electron measurements (cf. Ashcroft- Mermin)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
18K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K