The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, particularly the relationship between integration and differentiation. The user expresses confusion about visualizing how a 1-D curve, represented by A'(x) = f(x), serves as the derivative of an area function A(x). They highlight a struggle with the geometric interpretation of area functions compared to traditional tangent line concepts in derivatives. The conversation also touches on the concept of primitives, noting that all primitives of a function differ by an additive constant and that the integral of a continuous function provides a specific primitive. Overall, the thread seeks to clarify the intuitive connections between these mathematical concepts.
Chump
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this concept. I understand integration and differentiation individually. I even understand the algebraic manipulations that reveals their close relationship. However, the typical geometric interpretation of a 1-D curve being the derivative of the area function below it seems odd to me. I'm trying to get an intuitive understanding of how a 1-D curve, say A'(x) = f(x) , is the derivative of an area function, A(x). I think I might know where my source of confusion lays: When dealing with derivatives, I'm used to visualizing in terms of tangent lines drawn to a 1-D curve. It seems weird to apply it to an area function, which is more irregular polygon than it is 1-D curve. I hope my concerns make sense.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Googling doesn't help ?
 
try googling

mit Session 47: Introduction of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

and watch that
 
+ S[x+dx] = S[x] + f(x)dx. Obvious from geometry. => f(x)=S'(x)
 
William White said:
try googling

mit Session 47: Introduction of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

and watch that
Great video, but it didn't quite answer my question. I might not have been able to articulate my question that well over the internet. Oh, well. Thanks, anyhow.
 
I think the missing link between integration and differentiation is primitiv(-isation,-ization, -ation, ..., I don't know). It is the 'reciprocal' operation to differentiation: ##\phi## is a primitive of a piecewise continuous fonction ##f## if and only if ##\phi## is differentiable on the domain of ##f## and ##\phi' = f##.
The set of all primitives of ##f## vary by an additive constant. So all primitives of ##f## have the form ##\phi = \phi_0 + C##, where ##\phi_0## is a particular primitive of ##f##.
It happens that the function ##\phi_0(x) :=\int_{x_0}^x f(t) dt ## is a primitive of ##f## wherever ##f## is continuous (just show that if ## f## is continuous in ##a##, ## \frac{\phi_0(x) - \phi_0(a)}{x-a} \rightarrow f(a) ## as ## x\rightarrow a## ). I think it explains a little bit the link between integration and differentiation.The link between the area under the curve of ##f##, defined on ##[a,b]##, and its integral, comes from the construction of the integral of piecewise continuous functions from the integral of step-functions on ##[a,b]##, which are homogenous to an area
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K