The Hawking radiation and information paradox

AI Thread Summary
Quantum physics posits that information cannot be destroyed, yet the concept of Hawking radiation raises a paradox regarding black holes. When virtual particle-antiparticle pairs form, the antiparticle falls into the black hole while the normal particle escapes, leading to the potential loss of information as the black hole evaporates. Questions arise about why only the antiparticle enters the black hole and whether annihilation requires matching properties between particles. The discussion highlights the belief that even if information seems lost, it existed at a point in space-time, complicating the notion of its destruction. The information loss problem has significant implications, contributing to ongoing debates in theoretical physics.
kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Here is my understanding, please correct me if I made any mistake

Quantum physics theory suggests that information (the wave function, state, etc.) cannot be destroyed. All matters fall into a black hole will not be able to escape, which means all information of these particles stay inside the black hole. Virtual particles-antiparticle pairs are created under uncertainty principle, the antiparticle of the pair fall into the black hole while the normal one escapes (Hawking radiation), the antiparticle annihilate with the normal particle inside the black hole, eventually the black hole evaporates, all information inside is gone. It contradicts the quantum physics theory.

I'm not sure if there is any mistake in my understanding.

Here is what I don't understand

1 Why only the antiparticle of the virtual pair falls into the black hole while the normal one escapes?

2 Does the annihilation requires the normal particles somehow "match" the properties of the antiparticle? In another word, the virtual antiparticle can annihilate with any particles in the black hole or only those which have the same properties as the virtual normal particle? (the other particle of the virtual pair)
 
Space news on Phys.org
Any particle [or photon] that escapes the event horizon has positive energy. The popular explanation you noted is merely an analogy to convey the essence of a mathematically complex quantum process, and gives rise to this very natural question. The easy part is it is quite natural to assume any energy that escapes the event horizon must be subtracted from the black hole mass.
 
I might be completely wrong about this but it is my belief that information cannot be destroyed, even in the event of black hole evaporation.

The pure act of information being destroyed is acknowledging that said information existed at a certain point in space-time. Therefore, even if information were to be destroyed at a certain point, it would still be present from the moment it was 'created' up until the last moment before it was destroyed.

Now, unless we are suddenly able to travel through time and access said information, it would indeed be lost to us starting from the moment of its destruction.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Back
Top