The idea behind a reverse shock

AI Thread Summary
In a supernova explosion, the ambient medium is accelerated, compressed, and heated, resulting in a reverse shock that pushes back into the ejecta. This phenomenon is explained by Newton's Third Law, where the force driving outward acceleration generates an equal inward force. Some participants express confusion about why the shock moves inward rather than simply acting as a drag force, likening it to pushing a pillow across a bed. The discussion clarifies that the reverse shock does not reverse the direction of ejecta but slows it down due to increased pressure from the surrounding medium. Understanding these complex interactions in astrophysics requires a solid grasp of various physical principles.
Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
So in a supernova explosion for example (5th slide) http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~burrows/classes/541/blastwavesChisari.pdf

Ambient medium is accelerated, compressed and heated. It pushes back into the
ejecta, creating a reverse shock.


Why does it do this and not just emit a drag force? Why exactly does it push back? Are there conservation of momentum reasons also?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kidphysics said:
So in a supernova explosion for example (5th slide) http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~burrows/classes/541/blastwavesChisari.pdf

Ambient medium is accelerated, compressed and heated. It pushes back into the
ejecta, creating a reverse shock.


Why does it do this and not just emit a drag force? Why exactly does it push back? Are there conservation of momentum reasons also?
This reverse shock is required by Newton's Third Law. The matter that provides the force driving the outward acceleration of matter experiences an equal but opposite (inward) force from the matter being accelerated outward.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
This reverse shock is required by Newton's Third Law. The matter that provides the force driving the outward acceleration of matter experiences an equal but opposite (inward) force from the matter being accelerated outward.

AM

Yes but it seems this would just be modeled like a drag force.. you push a pillow across a bed and its restivene, but you don't get a reverse shock from it, everything in the system is translated forward.
 
Kidphysics said:
Yes but it seems this would just be modeled like a drag force.. you push a pillow across a bed and its restivene, but you don't get a reverse shock from it, everything in the system is translated forward.
I don't understand the analogy. What is "restivene" (typo?)? What does a pillow being pushed across a bed have to do with matter exploding through a gas cloud?

The physics of a supernova is not simple. These are complex phenomena and I don't fully understand it. But from the article you have cited, it appears that the matter being ejected in the supernova explosion is initially inside a dust or gas cloud. The exploding matter compresses the gas cloud and the gas/dust heats up and the pressure in the cloud increases. The pressure increases to a point that it exceeds the forward pressure of the ejecta so there is a wave of pressure in the reverse direction.

AM
 
Cool thank you for the response (resistive was the word) what I am confused with is that even if there is pressure on the outside cloud why would the shock be driven inword?? For example, if a bomb goes off doesn't EVERYTHING fly away? Unless the bomb goes off the shockwave compresses the air, PASSES the compressed air and then the air expands I have no idea why anything would be traveling radially inword from a radially outword blast. Isnt it a tad counterintuitive?
 
Kidphysics said:
Cool thank you for the response (resistive was the word) what I am confused with is that even if there is pressure on the outside cloud why would the shock be driven inword?? For example, if a bomb goes off doesn't EVERYTHING fly away? Unless the bomb goes off the shockwave compresses the air, PASSES the compressed air and then the air expands I have no idea why anything would be traveling radially inword from a radially outword blast. Isnt it a tad counterintuitive?
The paper does not say that the ejecta from the super nova reverses direction. It just slows down a bit and heats up due to the reverse pressure in the ambient dust/gas medium created by the forward shock wave.

The paper you cited is just a power-point presentation so it doesn't provide much detail. There are more complete explanations available such as this one. Astrophysics requires expertise in many areas of physics. Good luck in trying to understand it all!

AM
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top