The interference term. Confused.

LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
Can someone explain what the difference is between the expectation value of an observable in a pure vs a mixed state. The equations are identical. For example with spin up and down |A|^2<S_u|O|S_u> + |B|^2<S_d|O|S_d>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've quoted is <O> for the case where the system is in an incoherent mixture of |Su> and |Sd>. This would be a classical mixture, like heads and tails on a coin, and is represented by a density matrix rather than a wavefunction.

More typically what we mean by a mixed state is a coherent mixture, |S> = A |Su> + B |Sd>, in which case the expectation value <S|O|S> will need to include interference terms A*B <Su|O|Sd> and B*A <Sd|O|Su>.
 
Bill_K said:
What you've quoted is <O> for the case where the system is in an incoherent mixture of |Su> and |Sd>. This would be a classical mixture, like heads and tails on a coin, and is represented by a density matrix rather than a wavefunction.

More typically what we mean by a mixed state is a coherent mixture, |S> = A |Su> + B |Sd>, in which case the expectation value <S|O|S> will need to include interference terms A*B <Su|O|Sd> and B*A <Sd|O|Su>.

If you could quickly reference page 358 of this pdf http://www.physics.sfsu.edu/~greensit/book.pdf

It shows that your equation is equivalent to mine...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LostConjugate said:
Can someone explain what the difference is between the expectation value of an observable in a pure vs a mixed state. The equations are identical. For example with spin up and down |A|^2&lt;S_u|O|S_u&gt; + |B|^2&lt;S_d|O|S_d&gt;
That's true only if your states are eigenstates of O (so the interference terms vanish).

This means, you can't distinguish between a coherent superposition and an incoherent mixture by measuring in one basis alone. But you don't get identical expectation values in all bases!

Consider a superposition of 50:50 spin up and spin down along a given axis. If you change your measurement axis (corresponding to another basis) you get other ratios. In the case of incoherent mixing, the ratio is 50:50 regardless of basis. You can verify this by an easy calculation of the corresponding density matrices.
 
kith said:
That's true only if your states are eigenstates of O (so the interference terms vanish).

What are the terms that vanish. If the system is mixed or pure it does not have any extra terms.

Edit: I see the term now, I looked right over it, thanks!
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top