The James Webb Space Telescope

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the upcoming launch of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), including excitement, concerns about delays, and the implications of its scientific capabilities. Participants express their anticipation for the observations and data that the telescope will provide, while also addressing the challenges and costs associated with the project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement and nervousness about the JWST launch, highlighting the long wait and the potential for groundbreaking observations.
  • Concerns are raised about the weather forecast potentially delaying the launch, with some noting the importance of timing for the telescope's deployment.
  • There are discussions about the complexity of finding a suitable launch window, emphasizing factors beyond just timing, such as fuel efficiency and orbital mechanics.
  • Some participants question the high costs and long development time of the JWST, suggesting that it represents a gamble with significant implications for future missions.
  • Details are shared about the allocation of observation time for various scientific proposals, including a project called Cosmos Web that aims to image a large area of the sky.
  • Participants note that the total observing time allocated exceeds the number of hours in a year, indicating a strategy to account for potential operational issues.
  • There are mentions of videos and articles that provide insights into the JWST's development and mission, with some participants pointing out errors or misleading information in those resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share excitement about the JWST and its potential, but there are mixed feelings regarding the project's costs and the implications of its long development time. The discussion includes both support for the mission and skepticism about its funding and management.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the impact of weather on the launch schedule and the complexities involved in the telescope's deployment. There are also unresolved questions regarding the financial implications of the project and its future in the context of NASA's budget priorities.

  • #391
Side side with Hubble on the left from 2014
I turned on all the lights off in the office so I could see this in all its glory.
Wow.

1666268948780.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KurtLudwig, DennisN, Grinkle and 1 other person
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #392
sophiecentaur said:
Weird.
Perhaps I am reading tea leaves. The hexagonal pattern is obviously from the optics (likely the mirror shape) but to my eye the green shape is rotated 30o relatve to the red one. I having trouble figuring a plausability argument for that, either diffraction or refraction. One also should be cognizant that these are false colors.
 
  • #393
But why aren’t all (bright) star images like it?
 
  • #394
sophiecentaur said:
But why aren’t all (bright) star images like it?
My best guess (I just thought of it) is that it looks like the internal "camera" reflection from either the bright object in field or perhaps one just out of field off axis. I don't know enough about Webb optics to be any more definitive
 
  • #395
hutchphd said:
My best guess (I just thought of it) is that it looks like the internal "camera" reflection from either the bright object in field or perhaps one just out of field off axis. I don't know enough about Webb optics to be any more definitive
I tried blowing up some of the other objects but they all were too blurred.
 
  • #396
Is there a NASA source to get such images with full resolution?
 
  • #397
pinball1970 said:
I tried blowing up some of the other objects
Did you borrow Peter's blaster again? I thought we already had "the talk" about that... :wink:

1666288436083.png

https://www.deviantart.com/nocturnbros/art/Marvin-the-Martian-invades-DEATH-BATTLE-683673659
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Imager, sophiecentaur, phinds and 1 other person
  • #398
anorlunda said:
Is there a NASA source to get such images with full resolution?
The image is from the NASA site. I have been looking at other images and cannot see anything like this.
Dust has been mentioned, if it is fairly evenly distributed then could the rings which look almost concentric cause that effect via some sort diffraction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
  • #401
pinball1970 said:
some sort diffraction?
But there are no coloured edges and you don't get diffraction effects from massive objects (i.e. out in space). Diffraction would have to be taking place the telescope optics and would apply to many images of the appropriate brightness.

The explanation that it's due to ripples in dust, caused by regular pulses of light certainly gets my vote. 1. Regular pattern. 2. No colour effects. 3. The fact that it's a rare effect indicates some very high energy involved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and pinball1970
  • #402
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10074
with a nice write-up by John Timmer at
https://arstechnica.com/science/202...ed-from-galaxies-11-billion-light-years-away/

New Webb images illuminate the formation of a galaxy cluster​

A team of researchers is publishing a paper based on new images taken by the Webb Space Telescope. The images reveal a dense concentration of matter in the early Universe, potentially indicating early stages in the formation of a galaxy cluster. And thanks to the spectrograph present, Webb was able to confirm that several galaxies previously imaged by Hubble were also part of the cluster. It even tracked the flow of gas ejected by the largest galaxy present.
image-11-800x924.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and pinball1970
  • #403
Thread is closed temporarily for Moderation (and possible thread split to break off the side-discussion about diffraction effects in telescopes)...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and sophiecentaur
  • #405
https://esawebb.org/news/weic2219/?lang :
The NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope has revealed the once-hidden features of the protostar within the dark cloud L1527 with its Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam), providing insight into the formation of a new star. These blazing clouds within the Taurus star-forming region are only visible in infrared light, making it an ideal target for Webb.
weic2219a.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Maarten Havinga, Borg and 1 other person
  • #406
They have fixed the issue with MIRI apparently. Nothing on the NASA site though.
 
Last edited:
  • #407
Analysis of micrometeorite impacts shows that the May event was likely really bad luck and should stay an outlier instead of a regular occurrence.

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, andrew s 1905, vanhees71 and 1 other person
  • #408
Which one of those two guys actually threw the test brick? It would certainly be a CV item for him.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #409
Make your own JWST.

 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, DAH, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #413
I don't understand why they felt compelled to make a video of a still image/

"Better"? It's in different wavelengths. Is green better than red? Or blue?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #414
Vanadium 50 said:
"Better"? It's in different wavelengths. Is green better than red? Or blue?
Resolution, detail.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #415
Uranus is pretty featureless. The rings seem to come out better, but that doesn;t surprise me in the IR.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Motore
  • #416
Vanadium 50 said:
Uranus is pretty featureless. The rings seem to come out better, but that doesn;t surprise me
…please let me resist temptation for bad joke …
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, phinds and Borg
  • #417
The opportunities for Uranus jokes are...ahem...endless. And besides jokes, there is...inuendo.

Should I go on?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Borg
  • #418
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't understand why they felt compelled to make a video of a still image/
Standard way of getting good planetary images. They aren't short of light with a big scope (or even a home one) so a large set of sequential images allows software to reject bad ones, re-position the selected images and then stack them. It's better than plain stacking of a few long exposures. Also, the contrast range will be a lot les for a planet than for galaxies and nebulae so it's a very different job altogether. "It's a very different job.":kiss:!!
There are pros and cons about flyby images vs Hubble images. Hubble can spot changes where a brilliant flyby image just shows things as they are - once in decades.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Imager, vanhees71, BvU and 1 other person
  • #419
No, what I don'y understand is why they took a picture and then put the picture on Youtube,. Why not just post the picture, a la APOD. Or is that so 20th century?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and sophiecentaur
  • #420
Vanadium 50 said:
No, what I don'y understand is why they took a picture and then put the picture on Youtube,. Why not just post the picture, a la APOD. Or is that so 20th century?
Oh, right. That sort of presentation is reckoned to be more sexy, I think. Screen saver stuff. But the image is not very special in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K