History "The Lightning Tamers" (Nonfiction history of science book)

AI Thread Summary
Kathy Loves Physics & History is a highly recommended YouTube channel that effectively merges the subjects of physics and history, offering viewers an engaging and informative experience. The channel features well-researched videos that simplify complex topics, making them accessible to a broader audience. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of physics and history, illustrating how these fields have influenced the world. The content is both educational and entertaining, appealing to those looking to deepen their understanding of these subjects.
Science news on Phys.org
is a fantastic channel that combines two fascinating subjects into one engaging experience. I am always looking for ways to expand my knowledge and understanding of the world around us, and this channel provides just that. The videos are well-researched and presented in a way that is both informative and entertaining. I appreciate the effort put into making complex topics accessible to a wider audience. The channel's focus on physics and history also highlights the interconnectedness of these two subjects, showing how they have shaped our world and continue to do so. I highly recommend this channel to anyone interested in expanding their understanding of physics and history. Keep up the great work, Kathy!
 

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

History Memorable quotes in the history of physics
2
Replies
83
Views
5K
History History of the United States, Vol I, Charles and Mary Beard, 1921
Replies
1
Views
1K
History Biographies, History, Philosophy of Physics
5
Replies
233
Views
16K
History History Resources (documentaries etc.)
Replies
18
Views
5K
Historical Novels? (Siege of Malta)
Replies
16
Views
3K
History History's First Science Experiments - Comments
Replies
12
Views
5K
History Science and Public Policy: an Interesting History
Replies
2
Views
2K
History British Isles - a piece of visual history
Replies
23
Views
3K
History 536 AD - The 'Worst' Year in History?
Replies
2
Views
4K
Interested, curious, and somewhat intelligent
Replies
2
Views
783

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top