The math of a 'moment of inertia' in application

AI Thread Summary
To determine the moment of inertia for an object, the user is calculating torque and angular acceleration based on a setup involving a ring and a weight. The torque is calculated as 12.2 in.lbf, and the angular acceleration is found to be 3.84 rad/sec^2. There is confusion regarding the units for moment of inertia, which can be expressed in lb.in^2 or in.lb.sec^2, and how to convert torque and angular acceleration into the correct moment of inertia units. Clarification is provided that moment of inertia is defined as mass times length squared, and the distinction between pound-force and pound-mass is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these unit conversions is essential for resolving the user's mathematical challenges.
JohnG
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to detemine the moment of interia of an object, not too accurately.

I have the object mounted in bearings, and on the shaft of the object I have a ring (radius of 2.5in) which I have a filament wrapped around which drops to a weight of 5lbs (mass of .1554 slug). I can release the weight and time the travel over a known distance (approx 24in in 5sec, an acceleration 'a' of 9.6in/sec^2). Angular acceration is 'a'/'r' or 3.84rad/sec^2. I have determined the tension in the filament to be 4.88lbf by F=ma, m=.1554slug * (subtracting 'a'(conv. to ft/sec^2) from g(ft/sec^2)). The torque would then be 4.88lbf * 2.5in or 12.2in.lbf.

My problem has come down to the math. I have seen moment of inertia defined in both lb.in^2 and in.lb.sec^2. I cannot seem to figure out how torque (in.lbf) / angular acceleration (rad/sec^2) can be conveyed to MOI of either version, the units don't seem to cancel out right.

Any input would be greatly appreciated, until then I will have fun putting a sharp stick in my eye.

John
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Moment of inertia has units [M]*[L]2 (mass times length squared)
When you see inch*pound*second^2, the "pound" is pound-force.
When you see pound*inch^2. the "pound" is pound-mass.
Also note that radians are unitless dimensions.
I hope that helps.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top