The maximum height within a bowl using friction.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum height an ant can reach while climbing a semi-spherical bowl with a radius of 10 cm and a static friction coefficient of 0.03. By applying the equation tan(θ) = μ, where θ is the angle of the surface from horizontal and μ is the coefficient of friction, the angle can be calculated. This angle helps to find the corresponding height the ant can achieve before sliding back down. The calculations reveal that the ant can reach a specific height based on the bowl's dimensions and the frictional properties. Understanding these physics principles is crucial for solving similar problems involving friction and inclined surfaces.
w451208
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
An ant is trying to climb out of a semi spherical bowl that has a radius of 10cm. The static coefficient is .03. How high can the ant reach before it slides back down to the center of the bowl.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using tan(\theta)=\mu with \theta being angle of the surface from horizontal.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top