The maximum range of a missile_the earth is not flat

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the maximum range of a missile when considering the Earth's curvature, contrasting it with the flat Earth model where a 45-degree launch angle yields the maximum range. It highlights that accounting for the Earth's curvature complicates calculations, as it also affects gravitational uniformity and introduces the Coriolis effect, which influences trajectory based on launch direction. Participants question the purpose of such calculations, suggesting practical applications may be necessary for context. The complexities of missile trajectory in a curved Earth scenario are emphasized, indicating that simple models may not suffice. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate missile range predictions.
myleo727
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
We know if the Earth is considered flat the maximum range is obtained when the missile is launched at an angle of 45 degrees. But what if we take into account the curvature of the earth? what is the maximum arc-length of the range?:confused:
Thank you!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
myleo727 said:
We know if the Earth is considered flat the maximum range is obtained when the missile is launched at an angle of 45 degrees. But what if we take into account the curvature of the earth? what is the maximum arc-length of the range?

Unfortunately, compromising the flat surface pretty much forces you to compromise the uniform gravitational field. Also, you'll have to consider the rotation of the Earth -- the Coriolis effect will make it so that your result depends on the direction in which you fire the missile. What do you need this calculation for?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top