Yes, but it's not like the account you posted was a complete history. You are aware that two stories can be different from each other and both be correct?And we know he's not a Palin supporter? He doesn't really agree, does he? You saw the historically accurate account I posted.
I must be missing something here. It's not like the account told by Palin was invented by her. Are all the sources wrong about Revere warning the British when he was captured?
I'm not a Paul Revere expert, but something very bizarre is going on here. Didn't the head of the Paul Revere society claim that Palin got it right by accident? What does that mean? That she just made up a story out of thin air that happened to be right by complete coincidence?
Last edited by a moderator: