B The Missing Mass of a reaction

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Reaction
etotheipi
Wikipedia says this about the missing mass of a reaction:
The term invariant mass is also used in inelastic scattering experiments. Given an inelastic reaction with total incoming energy larger than the total detected energy (i.e. not all outgoing particles are detected in the experiment), the invariant mass (also known as the "missing mass") W of the reaction is defined as follows (in natural units): $$W^2 = \left(\sum E_{in} - \sum E_{out} \right)^2 - ||\sum \mathbf{p}_{in} - \sum \mathbf{p}_{out}||^2$$
I wondered where such an expression is coming from? The invariant mass of a system ##M##, in natural units, satisfies $$M^2 = \left(\sum E \right)^2 - ||\sum \mathbf{p}||^2$$ If anything, then the "missing" mass (which they also, confusingly, term as invariant mass) should go as $$\Delta [M^2] = \Delta \left[ \left(\sum E \right)^2 \right] - \Delta \left[ ||\sum \mathbf{p}||^2 \right]$$ I'm not sure why the equation they give is valid, since surely it is incorrect to bring the ##\Delta## inside the squared terms?

Is this just then an arbitrary definition, which is not directly related to ##M^2 = E^2 - p^2##? Thank you :smile:.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That section from Wikipedia maybe be referring to scattering as in this passage... and likely many others like it.

"Deep Inelastic Scattering: Experiments on the Proton and the Observation of Scaling"
Nobel Lecture, December 8, 1990 by Henry Kendall
https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/kendall-lecture-1.pdf#page=9 (see page 684 and onward)
1589097070013.png

1589095886730.png
1589095968007.png


describes an electron scattering off a stationary proton, where the scattered electron has lost some energy to a [hadronic] particle that was not being detected. Conservation of 4-momentum would read
\tilde e_1 + \tilde p = \tilde e_2 + \tilde W
so
\begin{align*}<br /> \tilde W<br /> &amp;= \tilde p +\tilde e_1 - \tilde e_2\\<br /> &amp;= \tilde p +\tilde Q\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />
where \tilde Q = \tilde e_1 - \tilde e_2 is the spacelike 4-momentum transferred to the particle.
So, the invariant mass of this particle that wasn't being detected must have been
W^2= M_p^2 + Q^2 + 2 M_p (e_1\cosh\theta_1 - e_2\cosh\theta_2) = M_p^2 - q^2 + 2 M_p (E_1 - E_2)
If one expresses the undetected-particle's 4-momentum \tilde W in terms of the energy and momentum components of the given and detected particles, one would get the expression given by Wikipedia.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top