The moon moves in a near-circular orbit around earth

AI Thread Summary
The statement that "the moon moves in a near-circular orbit around Earth" is accurate, as the moon's mass is significantly smaller than Earth's, approximately 1/81 of it. The Earth and moon revolve around a common center of mass, located close to Earth's center, which means Earth's motion is minimally affected by the moon's presence. This results in a slight wobble in Earth's orbit around the sun due to the moon's gravitational influence, but the effect is negligible. The discussion emphasizes that such topics are more suited for general astronomy rather than cosmology. Overall, the moon's orbit is primarily circular, with Earth's motion remaining largely unaffected.
lebbo
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
examine the truth of the statement

"the moon moves in a near-circular orbit around earth. because the Earth is so much more massive, it own motion is not appreciably affected by the moons presence"

please help
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
lebbo said:
examine the truth of the statement

"the moon moves in a near-circular orbit around earth. because the Earth is so much more massive, it own motion is not appreciably affected by the moons presence"

please help

this does not belong in "cosmology", but rather in "general astronomy"

the mass of the moon is about 1/81 times the mass of the earth

In the course of a month, the Earth and moon revolve around a common center of mass
which is close to the center of the earth---within about 3000 miles I reckon.
so the Earth's motion is hardly noticeable

so in its trip around the sun, the Earth WOBBLES a little because of it and the moon doing this monthly circling around each other.
but that wobble is very slight

like you whirling something on a string----something that only has a mass of 2 pounds, or 1/80 of your mass. You are going to wobble a little as you whirl it---but you hardly notice that, most of the moving is done by the less massive thing.

please put questions like that in General Astronomy
==============
or if it is a homework school problem then it should be in "Homework Help" section
 
Last edited:
thanks 4 da help
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top