The most boring quantum quench (looking for a textbook/paper)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around quantum quench dynamics, specifically the case where the Hamiltonian changes from H0 to H1, with H1 being a scaled version of H0 (H1 = aH0, where a > 1). The original poster seeks references that discuss this scenario, noting that while it may seem trivial due to the eigenstates remaining unchanged, it is important for a debate with a colleague. Responses indicate skepticism about the relevance of this topic in textbooks, suggesting that it lacks complexity and may not warrant inclusion in educational materials. The conversation also highlights ongoing debates among scientists regarding the implications of this scaling, with one participant referencing a two-year discussion on ResearchGate that illustrates the confusion surrounding the topic. Overall, the exchange reflects differing views on the significance of this quantum mechanics scenario and its treatment in academic literature.
extranjero
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hi,

usually, when we talk about quantum quench dynamics we assume situation when Hamiltonian of a system has a sudden change from ##H_0## to ##H_1##. System was initially in the ground state (or more generally - eigenstate) of ##H_0##. The interesting dynamics appears when the commutator ##[H_0, H_1]\neq 0##. However, due to the some reasons I am looking for a textbook or a paper where non-interesting case ##H_1 = a H_0## is discussed, where ##a## is a number (##a>1## for example). If you know such a book, please, give me a reference.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if you'll find this specific topic treated in a book, because it appears to be quite trivial, since ##H_1## and ##H_0## differ only by a choice of energy scale. The eigenstates of ##H_0## and ##H_1## are the same, so nothing happens to the state itself, only the time evolution will be affected, and then only by a trivial scaling factor.
 
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
 
extranjero said:
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
I don't see much interest in this. Would I write a textbook on QM, I don't think this would even make an interesting exercise.

May I ask what the debate is about?
 
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
 
extranjero said:
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
I don't think any textbook would help save that debate. One of the "debaters" seems to be stuck on the fact that it is a step function. It is easy to replace with a nicer "turn-on" function that will play essentially the same role.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top