The most boring quantum quench (looking for a textbook/paper)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around quantum quench dynamics, specifically the case where the Hamiltonian changes from H0 to H1, with H1 being a scaled version of H0 (H1 = aH0, where a > 1). The original poster seeks references that discuss this scenario, noting that while it may seem trivial due to the eigenstates remaining unchanged, it is important for a debate with a colleague. Responses indicate skepticism about the relevance of this topic in textbooks, suggesting that it lacks complexity and may not warrant inclusion in educational materials. The conversation also highlights ongoing debates among scientists regarding the implications of this scaling, with one participant referencing a two-year discussion on ResearchGate that illustrates the confusion surrounding the topic. Overall, the exchange reflects differing views on the significance of this quantum mechanics scenario and its treatment in academic literature.
extranjero
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hi,

usually, when we talk about quantum quench dynamics we assume situation when Hamiltonian of a system has a sudden change from ##H_0## to ##H_1##. System was initially in the ground state (or more generally - eigenstate) of ##H_0##. The interesting dynamics appears when the commutator ##[H_0, H_1]\neq 0##. However, due to the some reasons I am looking for a textbook or a paper where non-interesting case ##H_1 = a H_0## is discussed, where ##a## is a number (##a>1## for example). If you know such a book, please, give me a reference.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if you'll find this specific topic treated in a book, because it appears to be quite trivial, since ##H_1## and ##H_0## differ only by a choice of energy scale. The eigenstates of ##H_0## and ##H_1## are the same, so nothing happens to the state itself, only the time evolution will be affected, and then only by a trivial scaling factor.
 
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
 
extranjero said:
I know it, but in the anyway, it will be good to find this quite simple thing literally printed in a book (there is an old debate about this problem with my friend and he ask a proof in a book).
I don't see much interest in this. Would I write a textbook on QM, I don't think this would even make an interesting exercise.

May I ask what the debate is about?
 
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
 
extranjero said:
I am asking you to include this example into a future book, because some people (not even a student, but scientist who published in PRB) has a big difficulties with this.

You can see the 2 year debates and arguments on this problem here: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_my_solution_of_time-dependent_Schrodinger_equation_right
I don't think any textbook would help save that debate. One of the "debaters" seems to be stuck on the fact that it is a step function. It is easy to replace with a nicer "turn-on" function that will play essentially the same role.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Back
Top