The Mystery of Pseudo/Inertial Forces: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter NEILS BOHR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Mystery
AI Thread Summary
Pseudo forces are referred to as inertial forces because they arise from the tendency of objects to move in a straight line, which is a characteristic of inertial motion. In non-inertial frames, this tendency results in coordinate accelerations that necessitate the introduction of pseudo forces. These forces are proportional to the mass of the objects involved, allowing them to be connected to Newtonian physics. The discussion highlights the relationship between inertial motion and the need for pseudo forces in non-inertial frames. Understanding this connection clarifies the terminology used in physics.
NEILS BOHR
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Why are pseudo forces also sometimes called INERTIAL FORCES , even though their need arises because of non inertial frames??:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess would be because it was the only way to connect them to Newtonian physics such as how centripetal acceleration gets plug in.
 
NEILS BOHR said:
Why are pseudo forces also sometimes called INERTIAL FORCES , even though their need arises because of non inertial frames??:confused:
They are called "inertial", because they are a consequence of the tendency to move inertially. In non-inertial frames this inertial movement implies coordinate accelerations. Only for massive objects we can then assign a pseudo-force proportional to mass to them.
 
Last edited:
hmmm
ok thanks for ur answers!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top