The Mystery of WASP-18b: Uncovering the Mass and Rotation of Its Mother Star

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bjarne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the mass and rotation speed of the mother star of exoplanet WASP-18b. Participants estimate the star's mass to be around 1.2 to 1.25 solar masses, indicating it is similar to the Sun. The rotation period of the star is suggested to be approximately 5.6 days. There is also curiosity about the tidal effects on WASP-18b, with expectations of significant changes in its orbit over the next decade. The conversation raises questions about the existence of the star and the validity of the exoplanet's designation.
Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
Does someone know the mass of the mother star WASP-18b is circling around as well as the rotation speed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The only mass i could find for it was "roughly 10 times the mass of jupiter" from this article (http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/55066637.html ).

As for rotation speed, the only thing i saw is that it rotates inward and has an orbit time of around 22.5 hours.

EDIT: oops. didn't see mother star. facts above are for WASP-18b, sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bjarne said:
Does someone know the mass of the mother star WASP-18b is circling around as well as the rotation speed?

Given the period of WASP-18b, and its distance (~.02 AU), I come up with a mass for the star of 1.2 solar masses, which agrees with the articles which say that it is a sun-like star.
 
Janus said:
Given the period of WASP-18b, and its distance (~.02 AU), I come up with a mass for the star of 1.2 solar masses, which agrees with the articles which say that it is a sun-like star.

I just hear 1.25 times that of the Sun, so Janus you are very close.
And I hear one rotation: 5.6 days

How can the tide effect on that planet be calculted?.
(I have read that it is so strong what we expect the planet will be be 28 seconds faster in the next decade.)
 
NASA does not list a star with exoplanets with the designation WASP-18:
http://nsted.ipac.caltech.edu/index.html

Nor was there an exoplanet that came to light in 2006 with a mass of ten Jupiters.
http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/atlas/atlas_search.cfm?&Sort=DiscDate&SortDir=DESC

or that has the designation WASP-18b.
So you have a story about an unknown exoplanet that orbits a star that doesn't exist.
Maybe that is the mystery?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top