The Nature of Natural Frequency

AI Thread Summary
Natural frequency refers to the frequency at which an ideal oscillator oscillates when only a restoring force is present, without considering damping or other real-world factors. Real oscillators experience damping, which alters their oscillation frequency when left to themselves. The discussion highlights the distinction between the ideal case and the practical scenario of real oscillators. Understanding the context and boundary conditions is crucial for accurately defining natural frequency. Therefore, natural frequency is typically associated with the ideal oscillator, not the real one affected by damping.
cdot
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I've been told that the natural frequency of an oscillator is the frequency an oscillator will oscillate at when left to itself. Is this referring to the frequency of an ideal oscillator subject to ONLY a restoring force. Because all REAL oscillators are subject to damping and, when left to themselves, will oscillate at a frequency different than the ideal case. Even if the difference is small for many cases, it is still different. So is the "natural frequency" the frequency a REAL oscillator will oscillate at when left to itself or is it the frequency of the ideal oscillator with no damping? Please don't refer me to a Wikipedia page. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cdot said:
I've been told that the natural frequency of an oscillator is the frequency an oscillator will oscillate at when left to itself. Is this referring to the frequency of an ideal oscillator subject to ONLY a restoring force. Because all REAL oscillators are subject to damping and, when left to themselves, will oscillate at a frequency different than the ideal case. Even if the difference is small for many cases, it is still different. So is the "natural frequency" the frequency a REAL oscillator will oscillate at when left to itself or is it the frequency of the ideal oscillator with no damping? Please don't refer me to a Wikipedia page. Thank you

When you are told that "... natural frequency of an oscillator is the frequency an oscillator will oscillate at when left to itself.. ", were you also told that this is the ideal condition in which damping and other factors are not being considered?

Everything here has a proper context. If not, then we do not know what the "boundary conditions" are to be able to answer such a thing.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top