The new leader of China, Xi Jinping

  • News
  • Thread starter rootX
  • Start date
  • Tags
    China
In summary, Mr Xi led the new Politburo Standing Committee out onto the stage at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, signalling his elevation to the top of China's ruling Communist Party. The new leaders had great responsibilities, Mr Xi said, but their mission was to be united, and to lead the party and the people to make the Chinese nation stronger and more powerful. No surprise there. However, Xi Jinping doesn't seem to have as much power as the last leader. Rumor has it that the rest of the Politburo is stuffed with anti-formist conservatives. If this is anything close to accurate then I think we can safely dispel any ideas of fundamental economic or political reforms as well as China's rise as a
  • #1
rootX
479
4
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-20322288

Mr Xi led the new Politburo Standing Committee out onto the stage at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, signalling his elevation to the top of China's ruling Communist Party.
...
The new leaders had great responsibilities, Mr Xi said, but their mission was to be united, and to lead the party and the people to make the Chinese nation stronger and more powerful.

No surprise there. But, Xi Jinping doesn't seem to have as much power as the last leader.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
I found that article too hard to understand and it's full of ifs:
If reports from the Hong Kong press and China's blogosphere are correct .. If confirmed, long-term investors may have to rethink their core assumption about the future course of China.

But even the BBC analysis was gloomy and uncertain (from OP link):
No-one, not even the self-appointed experts, knows what will happen next

We saw exactly the same process in the old Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the late 1980s, as Mikhail Gorbachev's policies of glasnost and perestroika took effect.
 
  • #4
From what I've read, he seems competent enough. However, I can't predict where China will be going in the next decade anymore than I can predict where America will go. Ultimately, it will take time to tell what this new generation will do.

Hopefully-at risk of sounding like a cliched politician-the Sino-American relationship will improve, as I personally think that it will be one of the most important factors in geopolitics, if not the most, in the next decade. For good or for ill, mind you.

No surprise there. But, Xi Jinping doesn't seem to have as much power as the last leader.

That doesn't shock me. I think we are past the days of China having one clear man at the helm(say Mao or Deng or even Hu/Wen), and the trend will continue with time.I don't know... it took a lot of economic problems-and foreign ones(Afghanistan, East Europe, and the Sino-Soviet split combined with Reagan's foreign policy didn't help matters)-for the Soviet Union to go *boom*(before my time). China is experiencing the opposite(even with the anticipated slowdown), so they have no logical reason to change the system of government.

What I see being a problem for China down the road is demographics(aging, and the sex ratio. A whole cohort of unmarried, neglected young males is NOT good for stability, or for that matter foreign relations). I doubt Xi is ignorant of this-so let's see what he does.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Agree about the long term demographics. 4:2:1

Of course, given how weak their social safety net is, the burden may not be nearly as big as it is in western countries.
 
  • #6
intelwanderer said:
What I see being a problem for China down the road is demographics(aging, and the sex ratio. A whole cohort of unmarried, neglected young males is NOT good for stability, or for that matter foreign relations). I doubt Xi is ignorant of this-so let's see what he does.
Young unemployed males brought down many Arab countries but there were fears of same thing happening in China but it didn't happen. China has strong government and strong military to deal with any future unrest IMO.

Some timeline:
2009: China was worried about unrest because of unemployment in 2009 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7915372.stm)
December 2010: Arab Spring started around December 2010.
March 2011: Many feared of China catching Arab Spring
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12646848
December 2011: China still worried of unrest
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16026607

I believe even during the leader selection, China highlighted unemployment and corruption problems.

This all tells me that China has not only survived the worst time (Arab Spring) but is well equipped to deal with any future unrest.

I can't predict where China will be going in the next decade anymore than I can predict where America will go.
That's same with me :tongue2:
 
Last edited:
  • #7
rootX said:
This all tells me that China has not only survived the worst time (Arab Spring) but is well equipped to deal with any future unrest.

Maybe, but some serious demographic problems haven't yet even arrived; their population is aging and will continue to do so through at least 2030.

One child has two parents which each have two grandparents. Six elderly per worker in the not so distant future. (Okay, not quite that extreme, because the policy wasn't perfectly enforced, but still a large impact)
 
  • #8
Locrian said:
Maybe, but some serious demographic problems haven't yet even arrived; their population is aging and will continue to do so through at least 2030.

One child has two parents which each have two grandparents. Six elderly per worker in the not so distant future. (Okay, not quite that extreme, because the policy wasn't perfectly enforced, but still a large impact)
Actually, I wanted to reply to the aging point too. One thing I was looking at if China healthcare system is sound enough to have six elderly per worker? I found this article, http://www.tm.mahidol.ac.th/seameo/2003_34_4/41-3098.pdf, but couldn't really make a sound conclusion. So, I just decided not to talk about aging.

Another thing I also wanted to point that it's my understanding that Chinese parents are supported by their children so government doesn't have to worry about them all by itself. In case of western cultures, parents have to look out for the future by themselves IMO.

Combining my above two opinions, will aging be really a problem speaking on relative scale? I tend to believe that other developed countries have more to worry about aging than China because they have better healthcare and the families are more nuclear than Chinese.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
rootX said:
Actually, I wanted to reply to the aging point too. One thing I was looking at if China healthcare system is sound enough to have six elderly per worker? I found this article, http://www.tm.mahidol.ac.th/seameo/2003_34_4/41-3098.pdf, but couldn't really make a sound conclusion. So, I just decided not to talk about aging.

Another thing I also wanted to point that it's my understanding that Chinese parents are supported by their children so government doesn't have to worry about them all by itself. In case of western cultures, parents have to look out for the future by themselves IMO.

Combining my above two opinions, will aging be really a problem speaking on relative scale? I tend to believe that other developed countries have more to worry about aging than China because they have better healthcare and the families are more nuclear than Chinese.


There's no safety net at all in China. If you can't pay your medical bills straight up, the hospital will just let you die.
 
  • #10
rootX said:
Another thing I also wanted to point that it's my understanding that Chinese parents are supported by their children so government doesn't have to worry about them all by itself. In case of western cultures, parents have to look out for the future by themselves IMO.

It doesn't matter how the money gets redistributed, it still means 1 person has to support 6.
 
  • #11
Borek said:
It doesn't matter how the money gets redistributed, it still means 1 person has to support 6.
I disagree. It does matter a lot how the money is getting distributed. If children are supporting his parents rather than just government, the money circulates more hands before it reaches parents. The children contribute to the country when they are earning their money. They have responsibilities that make it harder for them to give up their jobs and go revolt against the government.
 
  • #12
rootX said:
They have responsibilities that make it harder for them to give up their jobs and go revolt against the government.

Good point. But I was mainly referring to the fact that no matter how things are organized, one has to work their tail off to support that number of people. That's not the way you make the economy grow, as all you can grant is the most basic life support.
 
  • #13
China's future plans are well known and the real question is how this will shake out politically. They're fighting the same battle as other overpopulated countries like Egypt. Already rivers in northern China are running dry at times, within a few years one of the major aquifers for Beijing is expected to run dry, and within twenty years northern China is expected to become another dustbowl. The value of water used for industrial products is 80 times what it is for agriculture so they've been on the world's largest infrastructure building project for the last several decades in order to mitigate the unfolding disaster as much as possible.

With the economy going into a tailspin and even China slowing down it's possibly time for them to switch gears from infrastructure building to consolidating their gains. In their rush to industrialized they polluted a lot of the water they have left and created a lot of other problems. The demands for organizing better will be entirely different from those of building infrastructure and with their new government if they do switch modes it will mean they do so very conservatively which is unsurprising. Whatever they do, the longer they put off the decision the more social unrest the country will experience.
 
  • #14
China's future plans are well known and the real question is how this will shake out politically. They're fighting the same battle as other overpopulated countries like Egypt. Already rivers in northern China are running dry at times, within a few years one of the major aquifers for Beijing is expected to run dry, and within twenty years northern China is expected to become another dustbowl. The value of water used for industrial products is 80 times what it is for agriculture so they've been on the world's largest infrastructure building project for the last several decades in order to mitigate the unfolding disaster as much as possible.

I'd like to see sources for this.
 
  • #16
Last edited:
  • #17
China academics warn of "violent revolution" if no political reform
http://news.yahoo.com/china-academics-warn-violent-revolution-no-political-reform-041407704.html
BEIJING (Reuters) - A prominent group of Chinese academics has warned in a bold open letter that the country risks "violent revolution" if the government does not respond to public pressure and allow long-stalled political reforms.

The 73 scholars, including well-known current and retired legal experts at top universities and lawyers, said political reform had not matched the quick pace of economic expansion.

"If reforms to the system urgently needed by Chinese society keep being frustrated and stagnate without progress, then official corruption and dissatisfaction in society will boil up to a crisis point and China will once again miss the opportunity for peaceful reform, and slip into the turbulence and chaos of violent revolution," they wrote.

. . . .
Let's see what Xi's administration accomplishes in the new year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Astronuc said:
China academics warn of "violent revolution" if no political reform
http://news.yahoo.com/china-academics-warn-violent-revolution-no-political-reform-041407704.html
Let's see what Xi's administration accomplishes in the new year.

How would a violent revolution even take place? The government is in complete control of everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. Who is Xi Jinping and how did he become the leader of China?

Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician and the current leader of China. He was born on June 15, 1953 in Beijing and is a member of the Chinese Communist Party. He became the leader of China in 2012, after being elected as the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and the Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

2. What are Xi Jinping's main political ideologies and policies?

Xi Jinping is a strong advocate for socialism with Chinese characteristics and has implemented policies such as the "Chinese Dream" and the "Belt and Road Initiative". He also promotes economic reform and opening up to the international community.

3. What are some of the challenges that Xi Jinping faces as the leader of China?

Xi Jinping faces challenges such as maintaining economic growth, addressing environmental issues, and managing relationships with other countries, particularly the United States. He also faces pressure to maintain stability and control within the country.

4. How does Xi Jinping's leadership compare to previous leaders of China?

Xi Jinping's leadership style is often compared to that of Mao Zedong, the founding father of the People's Republic of China. However, Xi Jinping has also been criticized for having a more authoritarian approach compared to previous leaders such as Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin.

5. What impact has Xi Jinping had on China's economy and global influence?

Under Xi Jinping's leadership, China's economy has continued to grow and the country has become a major player in the global economy. He has also increased China's influence in international affairs, particularly through initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
972
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top