The pendulum using Lagrange in cartisian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ananthan9470
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrange Pendulum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for a simple pendulum using Lagrange formalism in Cartesian coordinates. A key issue identified is the omission of a constraint that the mass must remain at a constant distance from the center, expressed as x^2 + y^2 = r^2. This constraint allows one coordinate to be expressed in terms of the other, facilitating the derivation of the equation of motion. In contrast, using polar coordinates simplifies the process since the radius is constant, automatically satisfying the constraint. Understanding these differences is crucial for correctly applying Lagrange formalism in different coordinate systems.
Ananthan9470
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am newly learning Lagrange formalism and I learned how to get the equation of motion for a simple pendulum using Lagrange in the spherical coordinate system. But I am unable to derive the same using the Cartesian system. If someone can please tell me what is wrong with the following derivation, that would be great.
Sorry for the sloppy paint work.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I can tell, you forgot to add a constraint to the problem in the beginning, which in your case would be of the form x^2+y^2=r^2=const. since the point mass is assumed to be at a constant distance from the center. From there you can express one of the coordinates as a function of the other one, and solve the equation of motion (not sure it'll be pretty though).
 
  • Like
Likes Ananthan9470
kontejnjer said:
From what I can tell, you forgot to add a constraint to the problem in the beginning, which in your case would be of the form x^2+y^2=r^2=const. since the point mass is assumed to be at a constant distance from the center. From there you can express one of the coordinates as a function of the other one, and solve the equation of motion (not sure it'll be pretty though).

OK. Thanks a lot. And in polar, you don't have to worry about that because you are keeping your r coordinate a constant to be equal to the length of the pendulum so the constraint is automatically taken care of? Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
683
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K