Measuring Force of Expansion When Water Freezes - DCM

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcmille290
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the force of expansion when water freezes, particularly in relation to pipe damage. It is noted that ice expands by 8.3% upon freezing, which exerts significant pressure on surrounding materials. Calculations indicate that the pressure required to contain this expansion could reach around 7300 atmospheres, far exceeding the tolerance of most pipe materials. The phase diagrams and the bulk modulus of ice are referenced as tools for understanding these pressures. Ultimately, pipes likely fail under lower pressures due to the presence of a water-ice mixture rather than reaching these extreme values.
dcmille290
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Anyone who lives where it's cold enough to freeze water pipes can relate to the following question.

Is it possible to measure or calculate the force of the expansion when water freezes? I hope that makes sense? I have seen everything from schedule 40 PVC crack and bust open and of course Copper and iron pipes do the same.

Thanks,
DCM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can calculate the maximum pressure the ice could exert from the phase diagrams (eg http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/phase.html) at a higher pressure the ice would turn back into water - this is a few 1000 atmospheres
I don't know if this is a reasonable pressure for a real pipe.
 
The bulk modulus of ice is 89 x 108 N/m2. Ice wants to expand by 8.3% when frozen, so to keep it in the same volume requires a pressure of 8.3% times the bulk modulus, or 7.3 x 108 N/m2. That's about 7300 atmospheres, far more than most materials can support.

Depending on the temperature, this may be enough to reliquify water, so this can be viewed as an upper bound. I suspect that, in fact, the pipes break while there is still a water-ice mixture in them, so you don't see pressures this large.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
14K
Back
Top