The Power of Kinetic Energy to the EK=1/2*m*v^2 Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy formula EK=1/2*m*v^2 and its derivation. The derivation involves understanding how work is done to accelerate an object using Newton's second law and the definition of work. The key steps include relating force, mass, and acceleration, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the work done to reach a certain velocity is equal to the kinetic energy. There is also a mention of the challenge in clarifying the actual questions or misunderstandings of those learning physics. Understanding the underlying concepts is essential for effective explanation.
Miran97
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!
The kinetic formula are EK=1/2*m*v^2. But how do we find it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you already found it!

What do you mean? (How you would find the kinetic energy in a particular problem will depend on the details of that problem.)
 
Maybe he/she meant to ask how the formula is derived.
 
The simplest derivation is to consider how much work is done to accelerate an object to velocity v. Let's say we use constant force to accelerate the object over some distance d.

F = ma -> a = F/m (From Newton's 2nd)

W = F*d (From definition of work.)

v² = 2*a*d (Let us know if you need help deriving this one, but you should have seen it.)

Putting it all together.

v² = 2*d*a = 2*d*(F/m) = 2*(d*F)/m = 2*W/m

W = (m*v²)/2

So the amount of work required to accelerate (or decelerate, for that matter) an object of mass m to velocity v is (1/2)*m*v². Hence the Kinetic Energy.
 
Anyone else want to guess what the OP's real question was? :biggrin:
 
Doc Al said:
Anyone else want to guess what the OP's real question was? :biggrin:
I've always found that to be the real challenge of explaining physics to someone. Once you understand what it is that the person actually wants to know or doesn't understand, explaining it is easy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top