The Pressure-Entropy Relationship for a Photon Gas

Bookworm092
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Given the internal energy U of a photon gas, one can take its partial derivative with respect to volume V to get the pressure P (or rather its negative). But if U is calculated by integrating Planck's distribution (see attached), then the result will not be one third of U/V, a result from kinetic theory. Please explain what has gone wrong.
Relevant Equations
See attached.
This is from Problem 7.45 of Thermal Physics by Daniel Schroeder.
 

Attachments

  • Stefan-Boltzmann law.png
    Stefan-Boltzmann law.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 361
Physics news on Phys.org
Bookworm092 said:
Homework Statement:: Given the internal energy U of a photon gas, one can take its partial derivative with respect to volume V to get the pressure P (or rather its negative).
When taking a partial derivative, you need to specify what other variables are kept constant.

From the first law ##dU = TdS - PdV##, you can see that ##-P = \large \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_S \;##.
 
  • Like
Likes Bookworm092, vanhees71 and Delta2
TSny said:
When taking a partial derivative, you need to specify what other variables are kept constant.

From the first law ##dU = TdS - PdV##, you can see that ##-P = \large \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_S \;##.
Thank you for your response. I managed to crack the problem. Both ##S## and ##N## are to be kept constant. But since ##T## is not constant, I can make use of another equation to express T in terms of something else. I had already derived an expression for ##S##. The answer comes out as expected from kinetic theory.
 
You cannot keep ##N## constant and varying ##T##. Since "photon number" is not a conserved quantity there's no chemical potential either (despite the fact that photons are massless bosons, so that even if you could introduce a chemical potential it must be ##0## anyway).

We have given
$$U=\sigma T^4 V.$$
The "natural independent variables" for ##U## are, however ##S## and ##V## and
$$\mathrm{d}U = T \mathrm{d} S-p \mathrm{d} V.$$
From this you have
$$(\partial_S U)_V=T=\left (\frac{U}{\sigma V} \right)^{1/4}.$$
This you can integrate (using Nernst's Law that at ##T=0##, where ##U=0## also ##S=0##) to
$$U^{3/4}=\frac{3}{4} (\sigma V)^{-1/4} S \qquad (*)$$
or
$$U=\left (\frac{3}{4} \right)^{4/3} (\sigma V)^{-1/3} S^{4/3},$$
from which
$$p=-(\partial_V U)_S=\frac{U}{3 V}.$$
From (*) you also get the more convenient formula
$$S=\frac{4}{3} \sigma V T^3=\frac{4 U}{3T}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and TSny
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top