The probability as an absolut value of the square of the amplitude

TubbaBlubba
All right, I don't have a problme with the concept, just a specific question.

Is the absolute value of the amplitude abs(r^2 + (xi)^2) or abs(r^2) + abs((xi)^2)

Or, to put it in a simpler way - Do you absolute the value of the square of the imaginary part?

The difference would be, say

2^2 + (5i)^2 = 4 + (-25) = (-21)
abs(-21) = 21

and

2^2 + (5i)^2 = 4 + (-25)
abs(4) + abs(-25) = 29

The latter seems more physically sound to me, but the former seems more mathemathically sound. Can anyone clear this up for me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The imaginary part is the part standing next to the "i", so in your example the 5 itself. Then you get the absolute value of the complex number by
|z|^2 = \Re(z)^2+\Im(z)^2
Or by using the complex conjugate
|z|^2 = z \cdot \bar z

For the first part I suspect you write your complex number in polar coordinates
z = r \exp{i \xi}
In this case the absolute value would be just |z|=r
 
Ah, I think I see, the absolute value is the distance from the origin? Thanks for clearing it up.
 
TubbaBlubba said:
Ah, I think I see, the absolute value is the distance from the origin? Thanks for clearing it up.

Yes. If you draw the complex number in the complex plane you can recognize the above formula as an application of Pythagoras' theorem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top