The probability as an absolut value of the square of the amplitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the absolute value of a complex number's amplitude. It clarifies that the absolute value of the complex number is determined by the formula |z|^2 = Re(z)^2 + Im(z)^2, where Re(z) is the real part and Im(z) is the imaginary part. Participants highlight that the absolute value represents the distance from the origin in the complex plane, aligning with Pythagoras' theorem. The confusion arises from whether to take the absolute value of the squared terms individually or collectively, but the consensus leans towards the former method. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurately interpreting complex numbers in mathematical contexts.
TubbaBlubba
All right, I don't have a problme with the concept, just a specific question.

Is the absolute value of the amplitude abs(r^2 + (xi)^2) or abs(r^2) + abs((xi)^2)

Or, to put it in a simpler way - Do you absolute the value of the square of the imaginary part?

The difference would be, say

2^2 + (5i)^2 = 4 + (-25) = (-21)
abs(-21) = 21

and

2^2 + (5i)^2 = 4 + (-25)
abs(4) + abs(-25) = 29

The latter seems more physically sound to me, but the former seems more mathemathically sound. Can anyone clear this up for me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The imaginary part is the part standing next to the "i", so in your example the 5 itself. Then you get the absolute value of the complex number by
|z|^2 = \Re(z)^2+\Im(z)^2
Or by using the complex conjugate
|z|^2 = z \cdot \bar z

For the first part I suspect you write your complex number in polar coordinates
z = r \exp{i \xi}
In this case the absolute value would be just |z|=r
 
Ah, I think I see, the absolute value is the distance from the origin? Thanks for clearing it up.
 
TubbaBlubba said:
Ah, I think I see, the absolute value is the distance from the origin? Thanks for clearing it up.

Yes. If you draw the complex number in the complex plane you can recognize the above formula as an application of Pythagoras' theorem.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top