The property of spheres that gravity acts on the shape as one component?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unique property of spheres where gravity acts uniformly on their mass, unlike elongated shapes like prisms that experience differential gravitational forces. The participant seeks a term to describe this phenomenon, highlighting that a sphere experiences gravity as a whole rather than in components. The concept of symmetry is mentioned as a potential descriptor for this property. The conversation emphasizes the simplicity of gravitational effects on spherical objects compared to more complex shapes. This property is crucial for understanding gravitational interactions in physics.
Sirloin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if there's a term for the property of spheres that makes gravity pull equally on all aspects of the sphere's mass.

The wording for what I'm asking is tricky, so I'll give an example of a shape that wouldn't have this property, a long prism. If you drop a long prism on an angle (like this: / ), then the side of the prism closest to the ground will hit the ground first, bounce up if the material has good elastic potential, then the side further from the ground will continue toward the ground. The prism has two components of gravity pulling on it, one for each end. And a sphere has gravity pulling on it as just a whole, essentially.

Is there a term for this property? Or at least a not-so-wordy way of describing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Symmetry
 
Oh, yeah. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top