The radii of the curvature of the spherical surfaces which is a lens

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the radii of curvature of spherical surfaces in lenses, emphasizing that they are not the same for a lens with a specific focal length. It explains that interchanging the surfaces facing the object and image affects the image position, as the lens can be treated as a composite system represented by 2x2 matrices. The multiplication of these matrices shows that the order matters, indicating that ABC is generally not equal to CBA. A special case exists where this equality holds, requiring specific relationships between the radii of curvature. Understanding the matrix multiplication is key to grasping the implications for image formation in lenses.
komal bisht
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the radii of the curvature of the spherical surfaces which is a lens of required focal length are not same. it forms image of an object. the surfaces of the lens facing the object and the image are interhanged. will the position of the image change?
 
Science news on Phys.org


Welcome to PF.

This can be thought of as a composite lens like you find in the eyepiece of a telescope or microscope. What happens when you look through a telescope the wrong way?

What level is this aimed at?
Each bit of the lens can be represented by a 2x2 matrix depending on how the particular bit changes the angle and position of the light ray crossing it. The effect of the whole lens is the matrix multiplication of the matrixes.

In this case you have three elements (a curved surface, a gap through the glass and another curved surface) so the matrix for the lense would be the product of three: ABC
Turning the lens around changes the order of the matrixes to CBA
The question amounts to asking if ABC=CBA ... and, in general, that is "no".
The special case where this is equal means a special relationship between A and C which you remember are the spherical surfaces ... iirc: the radii of curvature have to be the same and and the sign of the curvatures have to be different (the lens must be bi-concave or bi-convex).

You don't have to understand how this works, so long as you know how to multiply 2x2 matrixes you can see that ABC is not CBA
 
Last edited:


Is r.m.s potential drop across the inductor zero at resonance in series LCR circuit?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top