The relationship between F=ma and E=mc2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the equations F=ma and E=mc², particularly in the context of classical mechanics versus relativistic dynamics. Participants explore how these equations relate to each other and the implications of relativistic speeds on their applicability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether E=mc² simply replaces F=ma at relativistic speeds, drawing a parallel to how Lorentz Contraction replaces D = vt.
  • Another participant clarifies that E=mc² is a special case valid when an object is at rest, and introduces the more general form E=γmc², where γ is the Lorentz factor.
  • It is noted that in relativity, F=ma is replaced by a more complex expression involving momentum, specifically F=dp/dt, where p is momentum.
  • A participant mentions that F=dp/dt is valid in both Newtonian and relativistic mechanics, and provides a mathematical derivation involving the chain rule for derivatives.
  • There is a correction regarding the origin of F=ma, stating that it comes from Euler, while F=dp/dt is considered the Newtonian equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between F=ma and E=mc², with some suggesting a direct replacement at relativistic speeds, while others emphasize the complexity and nuances involved in relativistic dynamics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of their relationship.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for calculus knowledge to fully understand the technical points discussed, indicating that the mathematical steps and assumptions may not be accessible to all readers.

Starlover
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering about the relationship between F=ma and E=mc2. Is it simply that, at relativistic speeds, E=mc2 replaces F=ma? (much like D = v x t is replaced by the Lorentz Contraction at relativistic speeds)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##E=mc^2## is a special case, only valid when an object is not moving, of ##E=\gamma mc^2##. If you Taylor expand the ##\gamma##, the first term is ##mc^2## and the second is Newtonian kinetic energy, ##mv^2/2##.

In relativity, ##F=ma## is replaced by a rather more complex expression, which varies between ##F=\gamma ma## and ##F=\gamma^3ma## depending on the angle between the force being applied and the velocity of the object. Note that accelerations are not necessarily parallel to forces.

In other words, the two expressions you asked about don't have a lot in common except that they are both parts of kinematic theories. One describes an energy term that does not change, which is how it got overlooked in the development of Newtonian relativity. The other relates force and acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bcrowell, jbriggs444 and Doc Al
Thank you, Ibix! I see I was way off. I'm glad I asked! :)
 
The Newtonian equation, F=ma is replaced in relativity (relativistic dynamics) by F = dp/dt, where p is momentum. So force is the rate of change of momentum with respect to time.

F=dp/dt is valid in Newtonian mechanics as well, so it's valid in both relativistic and Newtonian mechanics.

To anyone who remembers their calculus, this should be a sufficient explanation. I suspect that many PF readers who ask this question don't remember (or haven't yet had) calculus, so the explanation doesn't always seem to "get through" unfortunately..

I'll go through the math in more detail, but understanding the technical points does require one to know/remember their calculus - at least the way I am going to present it. If we start with p = m*v, which is universally true both in relativistic and Newtonian mechanics, we next apply the chain rule for derivatives to simplify the expression. Thus we write dp/dt = (dm/dt)*v + m (dv/dt). When m is constant, dm/dt is zero, the first term disappears, and dp/dt reduces to f = m dv/dt = ma. In relativistic dynamics, p = ##\gamma m v##, so ##dp/dt = (d \gamma/dt) m v + \gamma (dm/dt) v + \gamma m (dv/dt)##, where ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2)}##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Thank you, Pervect. It was kind of you to take all this time!
 
pervect said:
The Newtonian equation, F=ma is replaced in relativity (relativistic dynamics) by F = dp/dt, where p is momentum.

F = dp/dt actually is the Newtonian equation. F = m·a comes from Euler.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K