I am trying to understand the role of the Jacobian in the Implicit Function Theorem. However, I have had a hard time finding any discussions that use the Jacobian and are accessible for my level. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ImplicitFunctionTheorem.html has been the best thing I have found.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

More specifically I am unsure about maintaining that the Jacobian be square. So for the theorem to apply book is it true that given m equations with n variables (m < n) the number of dependent variablesneedsto be equal to the number of equations? If so, then I think I see why the Jacobian will be square (maybe it shows my ignorance to even suggest that something not square could be Jacobian?).

Also, in the case of something like f(x,y) = 0 and we are interested in finding y as a function of x, does the Jacobian still play a role? I want to say the Jacobian is a 1x1: [itex]\frac{\deltad}{\deltay}[/itex]. Is it okay to have 1x1 Jacobians and is the determinant of a 1x1 matrix simply the single element? Furthermore, if in such a case the partial deriv with respect to x is 0, does the theorem still apply? Or does it just mean dy/dx = 0?

Hopefully this wasn't too rambling and unspecific. Any insight would be appreciated! Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The role of the Jacobian in the Implicit Function Theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - role Jacobian Implicit | Date |
---|---|

A Implicit function parameterization | Dec 30, 2016 |

Functional Expansion - Implicit and Explicit dependence - TDDFT | Mar 4, 2014 |

Implicit function theorem for several complex variables | Sep 8, 2013 |

Role of real & functional analysis in physics? | Apr 5, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**