The Science Behind the Impact of a Punch: Understanding Force and Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter benhou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact
AI Thread Summary
The impact of a punch is determined by the formula P=Fv, where force (F) and velocity (v) are key factors. The energy of the punch is calculated as E=(1/2)mv^2, indicating that both mass and speed significantly influence the impact force. Deformation effects, such as the displacement of the target and the energy absorbed by the puncher’s arm, also play a role in the overall impact. Additionally, the type of striking surface affects energy transfer; less deformable surfaces result in greater impact force. Understanding these principles is crucial for martial artists aiming to maximize the effectiveness of their strikes.
benhou
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
I have searched online and found that the power of a punch P=Fv, where F is the force of the punch and v is the speed. But in my mind it works like this: let's just say that only the arm speed is taken into account, then before impact, the energy of the arm traveling is E=(1/2)mv^2. That is how much work the target has to do to stop the punch. Therefore, the impact force Fi = E/L where L is the displacement before the arm reaches zero speed.

In conclusion, the impact of a punch is proportional to m & v^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in short you are correct that the impact force of a punch is proportional to the mv^2 of the arm. Of course, there are some additional small corrections that you could apply due to deformation effects. For example, the stopping displacement L is not a constant, but will increase slightly as the energy increases, because a good solid punch deforms more flesh than a soft one. Also, the arm and fist are not nondeformable objects, so some energy will also be lost in them as well. Hitting a brick wall will put more energy into your hand than it will into the wall.

Back when I was taking Karate, our sensei would often try to exhort us to punch harder and faster by quoting things like "Power = Force times velocity!". Of course, in physics words like power and force have specific meanings, which aren't always the same as they mean outside of physics. When punching, force or the energy absorbed by the target are more important than power. Consider these 3 cases, all using the same amount of power a) a fan blowing air (small force, high velocity, high deformability), b) a guy punching you (medium force, medium velocity, medium deformability), c) a guy punching you wearing brass knuckles (medium force, medium velocity, low deformability). Which you would rather be hit with?
 
Thank you!

The low deformability of the "weapon" would transfer more energy to the target, and less to itself. It would make sense that the impact would be stronger with less deformable weapons. Also, the less the contact area the more the impact.
 
The force of a Punch:
It’s easy to start from the equation that force equals energy divided by distance to confirm that the force is proportional to the kinetic energy of the punching fist. Since kinetic energy is (1/2) mv^2 you can then see the importance of the velocity of the strike and why all martial artists want to put body weight behind their punch (or why a good kick can finish a fight because it’s both fast and ‘heavy’). The distance referenced in F = E/d is the distance traveled during the impact to expend the energy referenced – e.g. the penetration into the target. But that’s not necessarily the end of the story. What you may be interested in is the deformation energy that’s imparted into the object that’s struck – useful when calculating if you can break a certain size and type of wooden board. To derive that relationship use the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum equations for the collision of two bodies – such as a fist and board. Then if you really want to be precise include a coefficient of restitution that reflects the hardness of the bodies being struck. Best reference for this type of physics of kicking and punching is the book “Parting the Clouds” by Grenville Harrop.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top