I haven't read much about the current social security 'crisis' in this forum, which is strange given that this is the politics forum. Whether or not social security should be reformed (or deformed) seems to be the pressing issue in Congress these days. Do you think Social Security should be partially privatized? Do you think that the Bush administration has other motivations for privatizing other than for the welfare of the people? Do you agree with this Boston Globe article that the President is exaggerating the 'threat' of a social security crisis much like the exaggeration of the Iraqi threat? Why would Bush exaggerate such a threat?