The source of gravitational red shift

Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
On the following website;

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/Walsworth/Activities/Atomic%20clock/old_atomicclock.html"

I read that;

The gravitational red-shift is a consequence of the local position invariance of the Einstein Equivalence Principle.

I know what gravitational red shift is and I understand the principle of Local Position Invariance but I don’t understand why gravitational red shift is a consequence of Local Position Invariance.

Can somebody enlighten me on this issue?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zman said:
On the following website;

http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/Walsworth/Activities/Atomic%20clock/old_atomicclock.html"

I read that;

The gravitational red-shift is a consequence of the local position invariance of the Einstein Equivalence Principle.

I know what gravitational red shift is and I understand the principle of Local Position Invariance but I don’t understand why gravitational red shift is a consequence of Local Position Invariance.

Can somebody enlighten me on this issue?

It just means that, in Einstein's elevator for example, a detector at the "top" will measure a redshift compared to a detector at the "bottom" from a source at the "bottom", if the elevator is accelerated "upward". And according to the Equivalence principle (local position invariance) it makes no difference whether the elevator is being accelerated in deep space or being accelerated in a gravitational field (at rest with the gravity source).

Gravitational redshift is a consequence of the proper acceleration, so if it's observed "at rest" in a gravitational field, then it's a consequence of local position invariance, since that's equivalent to accelerating in the absence of gravity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Al68 said:
It just means that, in Einstein's elevator for example, a detector at the "top" will measure a redshift compared to a detector at the "bottom" from a source at the "bottom", if the elevator is accelerated "upward". And according to the Equivalence principle (local position invariance) it makes no difference whether the elevator is being accelerated in deep space or being accelerated in a gravitational field (at rest with the gravity source).
What you describe is exactly the Mossbauer Effect experiment (Pound and Rebka) that was carried out in 1959 at Harvard http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v3/i9/p439_1
The photons gained energy (blue-shifted) as they fell from the roof to the basement of the physics building, and the experimenters had to move the source away from the detector at a constant velocity to red-shift them back.
 
Al68, thank you very much for your explanation. It is now clear to me what that phrase means.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top