The spherical symmetry of massive bodies

AI Thread Summary
In studying the motion of two bodies under gravitational forces, if one or both bodies lack spherical symmetry, numerical integration is necessary to determine the gravitational field and net forces. For a spherical mass, its gravitational field can be easily calculated, while a non-spherical mass requires a more complex approach. This method, which involves calculating forces between all mass elements, is effective for any mass distribution without relying on approximations. For smaller bodies, such as artificial satellites, the parallel forces approximation may suffice, but this is less applicable in astronomical contexts. Further references on accounting for non-symmetrical bodies in celestial mechanics are sought for deeper understanding.
rob60
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the study of the motion of a two bodies system interacting with only gravitational forces.
If the two bodies (or even one of them) has not spherical symmetry, how will you proceed? Indeed the Earth and the moon does not have spherical symmetry mass distributions but normally we consider them as..
thank you



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



 
Physics news on Phys.org
If one of the masses is spherical, you can easily find its gravitational field. Then you place the non-spherical mass in that field and do a numerical integration to find the net force on it. If the first mass is not spherical, then you first need to do a numerical integration to find its gravitational field.

This "brute force" method will work with any mass and requires no approximations or assumptions. It basically calculates the net force between the two masses by adding over all possible pairs dm1 and dm2.
 
Thank you, I've understand.
It is true that if the body is small enough it can be considered set in a field of parallel forces (with obvious and simple results) but this is an approximation that works fine, i think, for artificial satellites and for the bodies on a 'human scale'.
In astronomical calculations on the motions of planets and satellites, however, I wonder how it is take in account the 'non-symmetry' of bodies.
Do you know any reference?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top