In Padmanabhan's Theoretical Astrophysics by defining a ratio for comparing gravitational potential energy with rest-mass energy it is shown that if massive objects with M=10^33 gm are confined to small regions with R= 1km then we cannot use Newtonian gravity because the system has general relativity effects.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I wonder if we do not use an energy ratio and instead use only Schwarzschild metric or Einstein field equations can we infer the same ratio between mass and radius?

I already see that Schwarzschild vacuum solution is asymptotically flat because the ratio of Schwarzschild radius over radius vanishes if the radius coordinate approaches infinity.

But establishing the above mentioned ratio of mass and radius for the threshold of general relativity without using the energy argument is not immediately clear.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The threshold of general relativity gravity

Loading...

Similar Threads - threshold general relativity | Date |
---|---|

I Magnetism and relativity | Friday at 10:39 AM |

A Commutator of covariant derivative and D/ds on vector fields | Thursday at 6:20 AM |

I How can General Relativity explain the Moon drifting apart from Earth | Mar 3, 2018 |

A Lense-Thirring effect - General Relativity | Feb 27, 2018 |

B Causality Question | Feb 23, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**