The Titration Paradox: How Can pH = 7 at Two Different Volumes of Titrant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Titration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a titration problem involving 0.1M HCl and 0.1M NaOH, where the poster is puzzled by the calculated pH values after adding nearly equivalent volumes of NaOH. Specifically, they found a pH of 7 for both 49.9999 mL and 50.0001 mL of NaOH added, which contradicts the expectation that the pH should only be 7 at the equivalence point (50 mL). Responses highlight potential errors in the poster's calculations, suggesting that reliance on the simplified pH equation may overlook the contributions of water dissociation in very dilute solutions. The importance of charge balance in determining pH in such scenarios is emphasized, indicating that the pH cannot simply be assumed to be 7 in these cases. The discussion encourages a more nuanced approach to calculating pH, particularly when dealing with concentrations near the limits of dilution.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
I'm a little boggled by a strangle titration problem that seems to contradict what I know about titration. I hope someone can resolve this seemingly strange phenomenon.

Suppose you have 0.1M of 50mL HCl.
You begin to add 0.1M of NaOH titrant.
Assume that Na and Cl ions do not hydrolyze.

Find the pH of the final solution after
a) 49.9999 mL
b) 50.0001 mL
of NaOH have been added.

Please note that the volumes described above are exactly precise. All figures are significant.

This is not a textbook problem. I made up this problem and came up with an answer of pH = 7 for both cases! How is this possible? The only equivalence point should occur when the volumes of acid/base are exactly identical, i.e. 50mL of titrant is added. But according to my calculations, pH = 7 also when these volumes of titrant are added. I don't think it's due to calculation errors. I have checked multiple times, but could still be wrong. It just seems bizarre.

I'm willing to show my work, but first I request someone can do this and confirm. If you get a different answer, then please just say so and I'll recheck my work.

Thanks!

BiP
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How many decimal digits in your "7"?
 
Borek said:
How many decimal digits in your "7"?

When my calculator evaluated a pH of 7, I think it was about 9-10 decimal places, so something like 7.000000000

I am pretty sure the result was exactly 7. Not completely sure, but I think if I ran it on Maple with 50 s.f. it would come out to be 7.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

I will recheck and let you know. Have you done the problem?

Thanks by the way.

BiP
 
No, I have not done the problem, but I know what to expect. Your answer (zillions of zeros) is wrong. Show how you got it.
 
Bipolarity said:
I'm a little boggled by a strangle titration problem that seems to contradict what I know about titration. I hope someone can resolve this seemingly strange phenomenon.

Suppose you have 0.1M of 50mL HCl.
You begin to add 0.1M of NaOH titrant.
Assume that Na and Cl ions do not hydrolyze.

Find the pH of the final solution after
a) 49.9999 mL
b) 50.0001 mL
of NaOH have been added.

Please note that the volumes described above are exactly precise. All figures are significant.

This is not a textbook problem. I made up this problem and came up with an answer of pH = 7 for both cases! How is this possible? The only equivalence point should occur when the volumes of acid/base are exactly identical, i.e. 50mL of titrant is added. But according to my calculations, pH = 7 also when these volumes of titrant are added. I don't think it's due to calculation errors. I have checked multiple times, but could still be wrong. It just seems bizarre.

I'm willing to show my work, but first I request someone can do this and confirm. If you get a different answer, then please just say so and I'll recheck my work.

Thanks!

BiP

You probably did a numerical error in the total volume, but that's not important, still you get closer to 7 than you actually should. There is more fundamental fallacy behind the calculation. You rely too much on the simplified equation pH = -log c (or pOH = -log c in the basic case). This equation does not account for the ions from dissociation of water which become relevant in very dilute solutions.

Let me simplify your problem:
What is the pH of 10-7M HCl? Is it seven? No! Or pH of 10-8M HCl, that would be even basic! And pure water, being 0M HCl would have infinite pH!

Solution?
You have to do so called charge balance (I'll do it for the simple case of HCl solution):
[H+] = [OH-] + [Cl-],
then substitute from water ionic product, and assume HCl is fully dissociated:
[H+] = Kw/[H+] + c

So you have quadratic equation for [H+]. Solve it, discard physically irrelevant root, and take -log of the remaining. You will get correct pH even for very dilute solutions.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top