The transformer section in Flyback converter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transformer section of a Flyback converter used in Switch Mode Power Supplies (SMPS). It establishes that during operation, only one side of the transformer conducts at a time, and when transitioning from the primary to the secondary side, the assumption of perfect coupling can allow for a current cut without generating a voltage spike, provided leakage inductance is neglected. The Flyback transformer operates differently than traditional transformers, as it maintains magnetic flux through the secondary current, allowing for continuous load current through the magnetizing branch.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Flyback converters in SMPS
  • Knowledge of magnetic flux and inductance principles
  • Familiarity with transformer operation and design
  • Concept of leakage inductance in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the design principles of Flyback converters
  • Learn about the effects of leakage inductance on transformer performance
  • Explore the differences between Flyback transformers and traditional transformers
  • Investigate methods to minimize voltage spikes in SMPS applications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, power electronics designers, and students studying SMPS who seek to deepen their understanding of Flyback converters and transformer behavior.

NexusN
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone,
I am now studying the Flyback converter as a component in a SMPS,
my question is on the transformer unit on the converter.
There are Primary side and Secondary side in the converter,
at any given moment only either of the sides conducts, that is, when Primary conducts, Secondary doesn't.

From the book I am reading now, on switching to the OFF state, huge spike can arise as a result of the leakage inductance.
Does it mean, if we assume perfect coupling and neglect the effect of leakage inductance, we can actually strictly cut the current in the primary side from a finite value to zero without causing a spike, as the energy is free-wheeled via the secondary circuit?
Thank you.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it mean, if we assume perfect coupling and neglect the effect of leakage inductance, we can actually strictly cut the current in the primary side from a finite value to zero without causing a spike, as the energy is free-wheeled via the secondary circuit?

Yes it does.

We often think in terms of "not being able to change the current in an inductor instantaneously", but more fundamentally it's about not being able to change the magnetic flux instantaneously. In the flyback transformer the flux that was produced by the primary current is maintained by the secondary current after switching, so there's no discontinuity.

It's important to realize that this makes a flyback transformer a very different beast compared to a normal voltage transformer, as the flyback tranny takes 100% of the load current through the magnetizing branch (compared with say 1% in a normal transformer). For this reason a flyback transformer is designed more like an inductor than a traditional transformer.
 
uart said:
Yes it does.

We often think in terms of "not being able to change the current in an inductor instantaneously", but more fundamentally it's about not being able to change the magnetic flux instantaneously. In the flyback transformer the flux that was produced by the primary current is maintained by the secondary current after switching, so there's no discontinuity.

It's important to realize that this makes a flyback transformer a very different beast compared to a normal voltage transformer, as the flyback tranny takes 100% of the load current through the magnetizing branch (compared with say 1% in a normal transformer). For this reason a flyback transformer is designed more like an inductor than a traditional transformer.

Thank you very much for the explanation,:-p
I think this is a very important definition I must understand before I can go deeper in SMPS,
I was struggled by the current definition in the past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K