The units for current density don't check out

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the units of current density and electrical current. The equation for current density, J = n*q*vd, is correctly stated, where n represents the number of electrons per unit area, q is the electron charge, and vd is the drift velocity. The author initially misinterprets the units of current, mistakenly deriving them as coulomb meters per second instead of the correct coulombs per second. Clarification is provided that n should refer to the number of electrons per unit volume, not area, resolving the misunderstanding. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the error in lecture materials.
CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
In my lectures the equation for current density was given as:

J=n*q*vd

where:
n = the number of electrons per unit area
q = electron charge
vd = drift velocity of electrons

If you rewrite this equation as:

J=\frac{N}{A}*q*\frac{dr}{dt}

where:

\frac{N}{A} is the number of electrons per unit area

and

\frac{dr}{dt} is the distance each electron moves per second. ie. The drift velocity.
(this distance ignores the distance the electrons move due to their random thermal velocities. This is the distance that they all move together due to the electric field)

Now...

J= \frac{I}{A}

\frac{I}{A}=\frac{N}{A}*q*\frac{dr}{dt}

I =N* q*\frac{dr}{dt}

N * q is the total charge

I =Q*\frac{dr}{dt}

So the units for electrical current are coulomb meters per second.

However I know this is not true. The units of current are coulombs per second.

In the actual equation for current why is there no distance involved? I understand that you can model each coulomb as a particle, and then the current is a flow rate, ie. the number of particles per second. But when you try and derive this from current density it doesn't work out.

Will someone please explain how you can get from the current density equation, to the actual equation for current?

(the "actual equation for current" being I=\frac{dQ}{dt})

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CraigH said:
n = the number of electrons per unit area

No, it's the number of electrons per unit volume.
 
Ah okay, yeah that makes sense. It must have just been a typo in my lecture slides.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top