Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Russ, I am not your teacher either, so it goes like this, your justice system is based upon jurisprudence, when one individual acquires a right, ALL of the individuals, that that person is a member of, (the society that is American society) AQUIRE that right!
Back to that group again.
As I pointed out, it is in the semantic of direction of law that your court system tends to view all issue of cases of rights as being offset in balance towards the individuals rights over the groups right. I already know that!
The reality of the administration of law is such that when the rights are established it is for all of the people that the "Individual" rights apply.
And then in the courtroom, viewed 'as from the individual', it goes right back to the group as the "individual" rights are ceded to the entirety of society.
If you, as an individual, can acquire the 'legal right' to smoke marijuana, then everyone that meets the standard, that you set in your court case, acquires that same right, (Jurisprudence) the entire GROUP of them!
Without exception.
Without prejudice.
Without discrimination.
Back to that group again.
As I pointed out, it is in the semantic of direction of law that your court system tends to view all issue of cases of rights as being offset in balance towards the individuals rights over the groups right. I already know that!
The reality of the administration of law is such that when the rights are established it is for all of the people that the "Individual" rights apply.
And then in the courtroom, viewed 'as from the individual', it goes right back to the group as the "individual" rights are ceded to the entirety of society.
If you, as an individual, can acquire the 'legal right' to smoke marijuana, then everyone that meets the standard, that you set in your court case, acquires that same right, (Jurisprudence) the entire GROUP of them!
Without exception.
Without prejudice.
Without discrimination.