US judge cites Sharia Law in decision

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SW VandeCarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decision Judge Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a recent court case in New Jersey where a judge referenced Sharia Law in relation to a rape allegation made by a wife against her husband. Participants explore the implications of religious customs in legal contexts, particularly in secular societies, and the boundaries of acceptable practices brought by immigrants. The conversation touches on various aspects of Sharia Law, its application in different jurisdictions, and the broader societal impacts of integrating religious law into secular legal systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern over the implications of citing religious beliefs in legal decisions, particularly regarding issues of consent and equality under the law.
  • Others argue that while some aspects of Sharia Law may be beneficial, there are significant concerns about practices that could undermine women's rights.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of equal protection under the law, arguing against the establishment of parallel legal systems based on religious customs.
  • There is a discussion about the role of consent in relationships governed by Sharia Law, with some asserting that consent does not equate to acceptance of abusive practices.
  • Some participants question the legitimacy of religious tribunals in settling family law matters, particularly regarding the potential for coercion and the rights of children.
  • References are made to the legal status of religious courts in Canada and the UK, with varying opinions on their appropriateness and effectiveness.
  • Concerns are raised about the treatment of rape victims under Sharia Law, with references to specific cases and the requirements for legal testimony.
  • Some participants highlight the distinction between cultural practices and the principles of Sharia, suggesting that abuses attributed to Sharia may stem from cultural interpretations rather than the religious text itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views, with no clear consensus on the appropriateness of integrating Sharia Law into secular legal systems. Disagreements persist regarding the implications of consent, the treatment of women, and the legitimacy of religious courts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of defining acceptable customs and practices, the potential for cultural biases in legal interpretations, and the unresolved nature of how religious laws interact with secular legal frameworks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying law, sociology, religious studies, or those engaged in debates about immigration and cultural integration in secular societies.

  • #31
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jarednjames said:
GeargCantor, words fail me.

You OWN a car, you DO NOT in any way own your wife / husband.

If you take two people, one says "I want to have sex with you" and the other says "no", but the first proceeds to do it anyway, that is rape, whether in marriage or not.


I understand now that is a commonly accepted understanding in the US, but you are asking for trouble with this. A "rape" by a husband is not comparable in ANY way WHATSOEVER to a rape by a stranger. And this is exactly 100.00% certain.
 
  • #33
GeorgCantor said:
Reference please.
as above

OF COURSE! At least once in their lifetime. Isn't that somewhat obvious?[/QUOTE said:
rubbish unless you prove it with a reference

If she has had sex for 5 years with you on 1003 occassions said:
again, rubbish

I am not from the US said:
i prefer that law to ones such as having a hand removed for theft...
 
  • #34
GeorgCantor said:
I understand now that is a commonly accepted understanding in the US, but you are asking for trouble with this. A "rape" by a husband is not comparable in ANY way WHATSOEVER to a rape by a stranger. And this is exactly 100.00% certain.

The physiological and psychological effects of rape whether from husband or stranger are no different.

edit: i want numbers to prove you 100% certain. so far you haven't given any references and as such are working against the rules of this forum
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 106 ·
4
Replies
106
Views
18K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K