I The wave vector in 1st B.Z in Bloch theory

pallab
Messages
43
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
why q=k-K
why the general wave vector q (in the proof of Bloch theorem in Ashcroft Mermin) is represented by k-K, where k is in the 1st BZ ? why not q=k+K ( usual vector form) what is special about k-K?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the difference ? k and K can take both positive and negative values so all the possibilities are covered. You choose the definition which simplifies the math
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
no difference but I was thinking maybe k-K is the conventional one rather than k+K to use in this case or maybe there is "something special" with the k-K choice.
 
No, there is nothing special. When you derive Bloch theorem just start by defining a new vector G = -K and then you get to define q as k+G but the whole proof remains the same. It's a matter of taste.
 
  • Like
Likes pallab
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top