Thanks, glad you liked it.jedishrfu said:
Feynman believed that asking "why" in science is not a meaningful or useful question. He argued that science should focus on describing and understanding natural phenomena, rather than trying to assign a purpose or reason for them.
Feynman uses magnets as an example to illustrate the point that asking "why" in science often leads to unanswerable or circular questions. He explains that the properties of magnets can be described and understood through scientific laws and principles, rather than trying to find a deeper purpose or reason for their behavior.
Yes, Feynman's perspective applies to all scientific fields. He believed that science should focus on describing and understanding natural phenomena through empirical evidence and logical reasoning, rather than trying to assign a deeper purpose or meaning to them.
Feynman's perspective on the "why" question differs from other scientists who may believe that science ultimately aims to uncover the ultimate purpose or meaning behind natural phenomena. Instead, Feynman argued that science should focus on empirical evidence and logical reasoning to describe and understand the natural world.
Feynman suggests using the scientific method, which involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to understand and explain natural phenomena. He also emphasizes the importance of constantly questioning and testing our understanding and knowledge through this process.