Why Does AB*OA Equal (AQ)^2 in the Witch of Maria Agnesi Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ali PMPAINT
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why AB*OA equals (AQ)^2 in the Witch of Maria Agnesi problem. A participant initially struggled to derive this relationship using similarities between triangles ABP and AQO but found it complex. They later discovered that using similar triangles QAO, BQO, and BAQ via the AAS rule could lead to the conclusion that (QA)^2 equals AO multiplied by BA. The conversation also included a Mathematica code snippet for visualizing the problem, which helped clarify the relationships between the points involved. Ultimately, the participants reached a clearer understanding of the geometric relationships at play.
ali PMPAINT
Messages
44
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Give the Parametric Equation of it.
Relevant Equations
x = AQ, y = 2 - ABsin(t), AB*OA = AQ^2
Annotation 2019-08-17 232448.png

So, I understood the solution and the method, but I didn't get one part: How did it conclude that AB*OA = (AQ)^2 ??
I tried to derive it using similarities(with ABP and AQO), but no luck. Then, I tried to connect B to the origin of the circle(call it R) and forming BOR, and obtaining OB, and although the Parametric Equation of it can be derived, it would be much more complex compared to the book solution and it doesn't conclude AB*OA = (AQ)^2 . I don't know what to do next, any suggestions?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing the line segment BQ. What is the angle OBQ?
 
  • Like
Likes ali PMPAINT
The trick is to see that OA * OB = 4. One way is use similar triangles, QAO and QOB.
 
  • Like
Likes ali PMPAINT
This is the diagram I used. If anyone is interested, I posted Mathematica code below for an interactive Mainpulate. In the diagram, can we not say:
(corrected following as per comment below)
$$
\triangle QAO \sim \triangle BQO \sim \triangle BAQ
$$
via AAS rule. Then we have:

$$
\frac{QA}{BA}=\frac{AO}{AQ}
$$
or $$(QA)^2=AO\cdot BA?$$
angisiWitch.jpg


[CODE title="Mathematica code to inspect Agnesi Witch"]theCircle =
ContourPlot[x^2 + (y - 1)^2 == 1, {x, -3, 3}, {y, -3, 3},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True];
theLine = Graphics[Line[{{-3, 2}, {3, 2}}]];
theX[t_] := 2 Cot[t];
theY[t_] := 2 Sin[t]^2
myT = Pi/4;
witchPt = ParametricPlot[{theX[t], theY[t]}, {t, Pi/14, Pi/2}];
Manipulate[
point1 = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[theA]}];
point2 =
Graphics[{Blue, PointSize[0.01], Point[{theX[myT], theY[myT]}]}];
bLen[t_] := {theX[t] - 2 Sin[t] Cot[t]^2 Cos[t], theY[t]};
myLine2 = Graphics[Line[{{theX[myT], theY[myT]}, bLen[myT]}]];
myLine = Graphics[Line[{{0, 0}, {theX[myT], 2}}]];
myLine3 = Graphics[Line[{{theX[myT], theY[myT]}, {theX[myT], 2}}]];
greenPoint =
Graphics[{Darker@Green, PointSize[0.01], Point[bLen[myT]]}];
myLine4 = Graphics[{Darker@Green, Line[{{0, 2}, bLen[myT]}]}];
theLabels = Graphics[{Style[Text["Q", {-0.2, 2.2}], 14],
Style[Text["A", {theX[myT], 2.2}], 14],
Style[Text["P", {theX[myT] + 0.2, theY[myT] + 0.1}], 14],
Style[Text["B", bLen[myT] - {-0.1, 0.15}], 14],
Style[Text["O", {-0.15, -0.15}], 14]}];
Show[{theCircle, theLine, witchPt, myLine, point1, point2, myLine2,
myLine3, myLine4, theLabels, greenPoint}], {myT, Pi/20, Pi/2},
TrackedSymbols :> True][/CODE]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes SammyS and ali PMPAINT
Should that be BAQ, not BQA?
 
  • Like
Likes ali PMPAINT
Michael Price said:
Should that be BAQ, not BQA?

Ok thanks, I'll fix it.
 
  • Like
Likes ali PMPAINT
aheight said:
This is the diagram I used. If anyone is interested, I posted Mathematica code below for an interactive Mainpulate. In the diagram, can we not say:
(corrected following as per comment below)
$$
\triangle QAO \sim \triangle BQO \sim \triangle BAQ
$$
via AAS rule. Then we have:

$$
\frac{QA}{BA}=\frac{AO}{AQ}
$$
or $$(QA)^2=AO\cdot BA?$$
View attachment 248428

[CODE title="Mathematica code to inspect Agnesi Witch"]theCircle =
ContourPlot[x^2 + (y - 1)^2 == 1, {x, -3, 3}, {y, -3, 3},
PlotRange -> 5, Axes -> True];
theLine = Graphics[Line[{{-3, 2}, {3, 2}}]];
theX[t_] := 2 Cot[t];
theY[t_] := 2 Sin[t]^2
myT = Pi/4;
witchPt = ParametricPlot[{theX[t], theY[t]}, {t, Pi/14, Pi/2}];
Manipulate[
point1 = Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.01], Point[theA]}];
point2 =
Graphics[{Blue, PointSize[0.01], Point[{theX[myT], theY[myT]}]}];
bLen[t_] := {theX[t] - 2 Sin[t] Cot[t]^2 Cos[t], theY[t]};
myLine2 = Graphics[Line[{{theX[myT], theY[myT]}, bLen[myT]}]];
myLine = Graphics[Line[{{0, 0}, {theX[myT], 2}}]];
myLine3 = Graphics[Line[{{theX[myT], theY[myT]}, {theX[myT], 2}}]];
greenPoint =
Graphics[{Darker@Green, PointSize[0.01], Point[bLen[myT]]}];
myLine4 = Graphics[{Darker@Green, Line[{{0, 2}, bLen[myT]}]}];
theLabels = Graphics[{Style[Text["Q", {-0.2, 2.2}], 14],
Style[Text["A", {theX[myT], 2.2}], 14],
Style[Text["P", {theX[myT] + 0.2, theY[myT] + 0.1}], 14],
Style[Text["B", bLen[myT] - {-0.1, 0.15}], 14],
Style[Text["O", {-0.15, -0.15}], 14]}];
Show[{theCircle, theLine, witchPt, myLine, point1, point2, myLine2,
myLine3, myLine4, theLabels, greenPoint}], {myT, Pi/20, Pi/2},
TrackedSymbols :> True][/CODE]
Ah, now it's clear to me. Thanks for the help.
 
Michael Price said:
Should that be BAQ, not BQA?
What is the difference?
 
ali PMPAINT said:
What is the difference?
The angle vertex is normally located at the middle letter
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top