Theoretic doubt about the definition of derivatives.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of derivatives in calculus, specifically addressing the conditions under which one must use the definition of derivatives versus applying established rules. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the necessity of using the definition for certain functions, particularly when calculating partial derivatives at specific points.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of functions and their derivatives, questioning why certain functions require the definition for differentiation while others do not. There is a focus on understanding the behavior of functions at specific points, particularly where complications arise, such as division by zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between the definition of derivatives and the rules derived from it. There is an acknowledgment of the efficiency of using rules but also recognition of situations where the definition must be employed. The conversation appears to be progressing towards a deeper understanding of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that certain points, such as (0,0) in the original poster's example, present challenges that necessitate a return to the definition of derivatives. There is an emphasis on the importance of understanding the underlying reasons for these challenges rather than simply applying rules.

Muradean
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, this is a question that has been bothering me for a while. (Im in calculus II at the moment)

Why do i need to derivate some functions by definition and other times i dont? for example if somebody asks me to calculate the partial derivatives of a branch function in a a certain point, let's say (0,0).

i know how to solve the exercices but i don't understand the concept.

Thanks

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this generality, I would firstly ask, what are functions and why to consider them at all?

In the end, they are (often) used to describe a process, either in time or the dependencies between different locations. Or simply the size of a physical property. Many functions are quite complicated and one would like to have an approximation which is easier to compute. But almost always it is about to find out the behavior, i.e. the amount of changes: is it defined, is it polynomial, exponential or constant? For both the derivative can be helpful, because it is a local linear approximation and therewith easy to compute, and it shows the amount of change in a certain direction. You might want to know something about the time, a pandemic spreads, or about the slope of your track you're going to ski downhill.
 
fresh_42 said:
In this generality, I would firstly ask, what are functions and why to consider them at all?

In the end, they are (often) used to describe a process, either in time or the dependencies between different locations. Or simply the size of a physical property. Many functions are quite complicated and one would like to have an approximation which is easier to compute. But almost always it is about to find out the behavior, i.e. the amount of changes: is it defined, is it polynomial, exponential or constant? For both the derivative can be helpful, because it is a local linear approximation and therewith easy to compute, and it shows the amount of change in a certain direction. You might want to know something about the time, a pandemic spreads, or about the slope of your track you're going to ski downhill.

hum... that seems kind of vague, i just wanted to know why in some cases i cannot calculate the partial derivates by the the rules and i need to use the definition: let me ilustrate with an example... (Lets say i want to calculate the partial derivatives of f(x,y) and f(x,y) is:

| (y³) / (x⁴ + y²) if( x,y) is not 0
|
| 0 if (x,y) is 0
 
Well, it is always the usage of the definition. The rules are proven from the definition and provide a toolbox, which might apply to a problem or not.
Asking why a certain wrench fits and others don't is a bit strange, isn't it?
 
fresh_42 said:
Well, it is always the usage of the definition. The rules are proven from the definition and provide a toolbox, which might apply to a problem or not.
Asking why a certain wrench fits and others don't is a bit strange, isn't it?

Rules are way faster than the definition,(if i want to be more efficient into solving the exercices i need to use them) but sometimes, as the case i posted i cannot use them. I just wanted to know why, I am not always going to use the same wrench (definition) cause in the end i would lose time.
 
Sometimes the definition helps for special cases. For example, how would you prove that the derivative of ##f: x \mapsto |x|## does not exist in ## x = 0## using your rules?
 
ok i think I am starting to get it.
 
fresh_42 said:
Asking why a certain wrench fits and others don't is a bit strange, isn't it?
Using the definition of the derivative is more like making a wrench each time you need to tighten a nut and bolt, and the various rules are like wrenches that have already been made.

@Muradean, the word "derivate" is a word, but not one that is used in mathematics. To find the derivative of a function, you differentiate it. You don't "derivate" it.
 
Muradean said:
hum... that seems kind of vague, i just wanted to know why in some cases i cannot calculate the partial derivates by the the rules and i need to use the definition: let me ilustrate with an example... (Lets say i want to calculate the partial derivatives of f(x,y) and f(x,y) is:

| (y³) / (x⁴ + y²) if( x,y) is not 0
|
| 0 if (x,y) is 0

For any ##(x,y) \neq (0,0)## the function "behaves well", and so rules apply readily. Of course, the rules are derived from the definition, but are easier and faster to use than the definition itself.

However, at certain points the "rules" can become problematic; expect trouble whenever you try to divide by 0, or whenever you reach the boundary of the domain of a root-function for a root < 1; for example, trouble can occur at ##x = 0## if your function contains ##\sqrt{x}## or ##x^{3/4}##, or ##x^p## for positive ##p < 1##. In your example ##f(x,y)##, we can expect trouble when ##x = y = 0##, because we would then be dividing by 0 if we tried to use the formula in line 1. Of course, when ##(x,y) = (0,0)## we use line 2, giving ##f(0,0) = 1##, so in the actual ##f## we are not dividing by 0 because we switch to a different formula.

At a "troublesome" point, you need to fall back on the actual definition of the partial derivatives. By definition:
$$f_x(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(h,0) - f(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{0-0}{h} = 0,$$
and
$$f_y(0,0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(0,h) - f(0,0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(h^3/h^2) - 0}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} 1 = 1$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K