Theoretical physics after physics?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a bachelor's degree in Physics (UCAS F300) without a specialization in theoretical physics does not preclude the possibility of entering a master's program in theoretical physics later. Many discussions emphasize the value of a well-rounded education in physics, suggesting that exposure to experimental physics during undergraduate studies can enhance understanding and skills beneficial for theoretical work. While some argue that a strong mathematical background is crucial for success in theoretical physics, others highlight that practical experimental skills can also be advantageous, particularly in collaborative environments. Ultimately, having a general physics degree allows for flexibility in career paths and the opportunity to explore various aspects of physics before committing to a specific field.
Bradwast88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Theoretical physics after physics??

Hey all
I am going to do Physics bachelors course (UCAS F300).But i do like theoretical physics due to financial problems i cannot go any university which having theoretical physics courses.But i got a university which having only Physics courses i mean no theoretical physics.So i want to know is it possible to do masters in theoretical physics after get a physics degree (F300)??.I am an international student by the way

Thanks
Have a nice day
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bradwast88 said:
I am going to do Physics bachelors course (UCAS F300).But i do like theoretical physics due to financial problems i cannot go any university which having theoretical physics courses.But i got a university which having only Physics courses i mean no theoretical physics.So i want to know is it possible to do masters in theoretical physics after get a physics degree (F300)??.I am an international student by the way

I think it's probably better if as an undergraduate you *don't* specialize in theoretical physics. If you want to be a good physics theorist, you need to understand the process of physics observation. This is hard to do as a graduate student, so as an undergraduate, it's a good idea to have lots of exposure to experimental physics.
 


twofish-quant said:
I think it's probably better if as an undergraduate you *don't* specialize in theoretical physics. If you want to be a good physics theorist, you need to understand the process of physics observation. This is hard to do as a graduate student, so as an undergraduate, it's a good idea to have lots of exposure to experimental physics.

I'd agree with twofish_quant if you actually want to become a professional theoretical physicist. However, if you just want to do a masters, I'd disagree.

Personally, I went from straight physics to theoretical physics - the experimental skills I picked up haven't helped at all with the course I am currently doing. In fact my shortcomings in mathematics have held me back considerably (but to be fair, the TP course I am doing is run by a maths department, so perhaps this is to be expected)
 


I'm currently in the final year of a four-year physics (UCAS F303) course, and will be going into theoretical physics after this year. I would like to add that taking the straight physics course doesn't necessarily limit you too much, as part of the four year course I had to do a two-year extended research project. At many (most?) universities, there will be a mixture of theoretical and experimental projects on offer, so I have participated in theoretical physics research for a year and a half now.

I'd also echo what two-fish quant says - the ability to understand and/or propose an experiment is invaluable to a physicist - whether experimental or theoretical. I've certainly found this skill useful, working in a group that has strong experimental links and absolutely invaluable in group seminars / school colloquiums and in suggesting ways to observe phenomena that I've predicted. As vertices says - the skills may not directly help with courses, but this doesn't mean they aren't useful.

Basically, don't worry about not specialising in theoretical physics. It also leaves some avenues open if you decide that actually theory isn't for you. Try and get some experimental experience anyway - I found it useful and gave me some real insight into the methods and problems associated with measuring real physics.
 
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
Back
Top