Theoretical Physics: Seeking Understanding from Afar

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a second-year physics undergraduate who is passionate about theoretical physics but is constrained by limited opportunities in their home country. The individual expresses concern over the lack of a stimulating scientific atmosphere and the predominance of funding directed towards applied sciences rather than fundamental research. They seek advice on whether interacting with physicists through conferences and emails can suffice in lieu of direct, face-to-face engagement. Responses highlight that while theoretical physics often involves collaboration with experimentalists, the absence of a supportive academic environment and mentorship could hinder progress. The conversation emphasizes the importance of networking and guidance in pursuing a successful career in theoretical physics, particularly when local resources are scarce.
Fizik
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am a 2nd year physics undergraduate. I realize that basically there are two types of sciences, one of them to develop technology with scientific knowledge while the other one to seek for fundamental understanding of the physical laws governing the universe.

I am passionate in doing the latter, which is to seek for a better understanding of the physical laws. My method for doing it will be developing theory or refining theory instead of doing experiments to verify or search for manifestation of physical laws. In short, I am passionate in theoretical physics.

I think to do a good theoretical physics one has to closely interact with excellent physicists around the world. However, for some reasons, I am not able to go abroad for physics study (graduate and post-doc) and can only stay in my own country in which stimulating scientific atmosphere is not here. Then, my question is, do you think this will be a big problem to me? Will it be sufficient if I interact with excellent physicists simply by means of conference and emails, instead of face-to-face interaction?

Thx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fizik said:
I realize that basically there are two types of sciences, one of them to develop technology with scientific knowledge while the other one to seek for fundamental understanding of the physical laws governing the universe.

This is not a good description of how science operates. It might be a fair description of the difference between engineering and physics.

Which country are you in, what area of theory are you interested in, and why do you feel there isn't a good atmosphere there?
 
hi Locarian,

I would like to keep where i am from a secret.. sorry ya..

The point is, due to limited resources that are allocated for scientific development in my country, most of the resources will be given to those science that can bring my country money as a reward. In other words, science for fundamental understanding of nature is not really encouraged here. So.. I feel quiet worried, as i know, to do goos science one can't isolate himself/herself from the other scientists. However, I realize that the only way I keep myself in contact with those excellent scientists will only be a short-period ones like conference... I really wish to immerse myself in a stimulating scientific community like that one in coperhagen last time!

By the way, work in any field is just OK for me because I realize that the greatest joy that I can have is to work with excellent people in playing with nature.
 
Last edited:
I asked what area of theory you were interested in because one does not just study "theory." You may be in condensed matter theory, or high energy physics theory, etc.

In any case, in theory you will typically work along side experimentalists. If there aren't any where you are, you may be out of luck. More importantly, if there isn't a good adviser, professors and others who can guide you, I don't know what you expect to do.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top