Theory of Damping: General Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gackhammer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping Theory
Gackhammer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Is there a general equation of damping? I know that there is a second ODE for damping with regards to springs, and with RLC circuits, but is there a general form of damping equations (with critical-damp, overdamp, and under-damp). I know how to solve second ODEs, but I was wondering if there was a general equation, because all I could find are equations that relate specifically to springs or RLC Circuits
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try google for multi degree of freedom (MDOF) systems analysed using normal modes.

A general equation in that form is ##\ddot x + 2\beta\omega\dot x + \omega^2 x = f## where ##\beta## is < 1, = 1 or > 1 for under damping, critical, or over damping and ##\omega## is the undamped oscillation frequency.
 
it's the same as with RLC or the mechanical spring, mass, and dashpot models.

just a simple 2nd order differential eq.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top